Synchronized FM signals

How effective are they at filling in or expanding coverage for FM stations?  The answer is, it depends.  Most have heard of the quadcast around New York City on 107.1 MHz formed in 1996-98.  It was well documented in Radio World and several other publications as a clever way to overcome the suburban rimshot problem.  Four signals on 107.1 were synchronized using GPS timing data, then fed the same program material.  They were WYNY, Briarcliff Manor, NY; WWXY, Hampton Bays (Long Island), NY; WWYZ, Long Branch, NJ; and WWYY Belvidere, NJ.  These being four separate Class A FM stations, the 60 dBu contours did not overlap.  There was some mutual interference in some areas, but there were few if any reception negative zones where the signal strength is equal between stations.

In early 2003, I was a part of the disassembly of the quadcast.  In the end, it is difficult to point to any one thing that leads to the breakup.  The station’s owners, Big City Radio, had filed for bankruptcy.  I am not sure if the company ever had the correct formula for marketing and sales, given the strong suburban, but weak and lacking building penetration in Manhattan signal.  The station initially had a country format, something that armchair quarterbacks said would not work in New York City.  After a few years, Big City changed the format to Rumba, a Spanish/Caribbean music format, which did worse than Country.  The fact is, that it never lived up to expectations and the station was worth more separately than together.  Given the right circumstances, it could have worked.

The other synchronized FM broadcasts are those where boosters are employed.  These are a good deal more difficult to configure because the booster signal is within the main station’s 60 dBu contour.  Often cases, where there is severe terrain shadowing or other limitations, a well-positioned booster that is in a population center can greatly improve the signal in those areas.  This was formerly the duty of an FM translator, however, those stations seem to be taking on a life of their own, without regard for the intent of the current FCC rules.  Boosters can also be called a single frequency repeaters or single frequency network (SFN).

The disadvantages of an SFN are the aforementioned negative reception areas.  To the receiver, this will create a multipath or picket fencing situation, which is objectionable to most listeners.  The advantages are, of course, better coverage in key areas, spectrum efficiency, and the ability to create a network of common frequency systems.  Think of how easy it would be if all NPR stations were all on the same frequency, for example.

The key to making a booster work is to synchronize several aspects of the RF and Audio signals:

  • RF carrier frequency
  • Stereo pilot frequency and phase
  • Audio amplitude and phase

The RF carrier frequency, stereo pilot frequency, and phase are locked with a GPS. Most transmitters have a 10 MHz or 1 PPS input for this.

The audio amplitude and phase synchronization are slightly more complicated. Basically, all of the audio should be coming from one audio processor and the path to the individual transmitter sites has to be very low latency. RF STLs work for this setup well, if there are suitable paths.

Once that is established, the audio timing is used to move the interference zone away from undesirable areas. There will always be an interference zone where both signals are received at the same relative strength causing dropouts.

WDBY, Patterson, NY 60 dBu contour
WDBY, Patterson, NY 60 dBu contour

This is the situation with WDBY in Patterson, NY.  The main transmitter site is located on a hill in Patterson and has a power level of 900 Watts at 610 feet (186 meters) HAAT. The main population area is Danbury, CT, to the southeast, about 12 miles away.  Between the two, there are several imposing hills, which create reception issues in Danbury.  Therefore, WDBY FM1 was placed in service at the Danbury Medical Center.  The booster has a power output of 1,200 Watts, at 0 feet (0 meters) HAAT (49 meters AGL).

WDBY FM-1 signal, Danbury, CT 60 dBu contour
WDBY FM-1 signal, Danbury, CT 60 dBu contour

Therefore, the southern area of the 60 dBu contour is filled in by the booster.  The interference zone between the two transmitters is determined by the amount of delay in the audio between the two units.  If both are time the same, the interference will occur at precisely 1/2 the distance between the transmitter sites, which in this case is 10.18 KM from the booster.  Looking at the population maps, it might be better to move that more toward the north, away from Danbury.

The formula for computing audio delay time is:

A-B=C where A is the distance between the transmitters and B is the distance to the interference zone from any given transmitter.  The product of that is multiplied by a constant of 3.34 to obtain the time delay in microseconds.  Therefore, if the interference zone is desired to be further outside of Danbury, say 15 KM away, then the equation looks like this:

20.358 kM -15.0 kM = 5.358 KM

5.358 KM x 3.34 = 17.89 μS delay from the main transmitter site will put the interference zone out in the middle of nowhere, away from Danbury.  This is the total delay between the two stations, therefore any difference in STL paths needs to be included in this figure.

Nautel has a good webinar on SFNs which can be found on their website: Single Frequency Networks Webinar

Nautel equipment has most of these features built into it, therefore, the implementation of an SFN using Nautel exciters and transmitters should be relatively straightforward.

The head smasher

I have worked in hundreds of transmitter sites over the years; AM, FM, TV, HF, Two way, Paging, Cellular, etc.  So many, I have lost count.  The one thing that is always annoying is equipment that is suspended from the ceiling at just the wrong height, AKA: The Head Smasher.  It does not matter if warning signs are posted, I’ve seen them marked with black and yellow caution tape, and so on.  If it is installed low enough for somebody to hit their head, contusions will result.

3 1/8 inch motorized coax switch mounted
3 1/8 inch motorized coax switch mounted

Thus, when it came to installing this motorized 3 1/8-inch coax switch, there was only one way to do it.  Installing it the other way would result in a head smasher behind the backup transmitter because the ceilings are low.  The problem with this style of mounting is how to get to the motor and clutch assembly for servicing.  There is but one inch of clearance between the top of the coax switch and the transmitter room’s ceiling.  If servicing is needed, the entire switch would need to be removed, resulting in lots of extra work and off-air time.

3 1/8 inch motorized coax switch cover
3 1/8 inch motorized coax switch cover

So, an idea was formed.  Why not cut the switch cover in half and put some hinges on it.  The cover itself is made of aluminum.  I was able to carefully mark it out and cut it with a jig saw.  Then, I attached a set of hinges on the back side and a set of latches on the front.  It now opens like a clam shell.

3 1/8 inch coax switch cover modification
3 1/8 inch coax switch cover modification

Now, when access is needed to either the motor or clutch, the cover can be opened up and removed.  Unless the actual RF contact fingers burn out, there should be no need physically remove the switch for servicing.

3 1/8 inch coax switch cover, modified
3 1/8 inch coax switch cover, modified

Cover replaced.  This will not have to be removed very often, in fact, I have known some coax switches that never need service.  Still, having the ability to quickly get the cover off and do some basic repairs is a good thing.

Conduit fill

It may be surprising to some, but the number of wires allowed in any given conduit is not “as many as can be jammed in there.” The National Electrical Code, AKA NEC or NFPA 70 gives specific guidance on the number of current-carrying conductors allowed in any specific size and type of conduit.

This is due to the fact that current-carrying conductors generate heat.  Cables enclosed in a conduit need to dissipate that heat so that the insulation on the cable doesn’t melt, which would be a bad outcome.

Conduit fill tables are found in Chapter 9 of the NEC.  There are several tables that give the number of conductors for each size and type of conduit.  Then there is the general rule of thumb that for more than two cables, the maximum conduit fill is 40%.  This comes in handy when several different size conductors are being run in the same conduit.

An example of this is when several circuits are going across the room to the same general location, in this case, a row of transmitters and racks.  Instead of running individual conduits for all those units, one or two conduits from the electrical panel are run to a square wireway, then the individual circuits are broken out and wired from wireway to the individual loads.  In this case, the following equipment is being connected:

  • Harris FM25K: 100 amp 3 phase high voltage power supply (#2 THHN), 30 amp 3 phase transmitter cabinet (#10 THHN)
  • Harris FM3.5K: 70 amp split phase (#6 THHN)
  • Harris MW1A: 30 amp split phase (#10 THHN)
  • Two equipment racks: 20 amp single phase (#12 THHN)
  • Coax switch: 15 amp single phase (#14 THHN)
  • Dummy Load: 15 amp single phase (#14 THHN)
  • Antenna switch/dissipation network for AM station: 15 amp split phase (#14 THHN)
  • Convenience outlets for the back wall: 20 amp single phase (#12 THHN)

Excluding grounding conductors, which will be addressed below, the total current carrying conductor count is thus:

  • #2 THHN: 3 each
  • #6 THHN: 3 each
  • #10 THHN: 7 each
  • #12 THHN: 6 each
  • #14 THHN: 6 each

Ampacities based on NEC table 310.16, THHN insulation in dry locations, maximum temperature rating is 90° C (194° F) based on the ambient temperature of 30° C (86° F)

Grounding conductors for each of those circuits, based on NEC Table 250.122 (all conductors are copper):

  • 100 amp circuit: #8
  • 70 amp circuit: #8
  • 30 amp circuit: #10
  • 20 amp circuit: #12
  • 15 amp circuit: #14

The final conductor count is:

  • #2 THHN: 3 each
  • #6 THHN: 3 each
  • #8 THHN: 2 each
  • #10 THHN: 9 each
  • #12 THHN: 9 each
  • #14 THHN: 9 each

The plan is to use two 1 and 1/2-inch EMT conduits between the electrical service panel and the 4 x 4 square wireway. According to  NEC Chapter 9, Table 4, the 40% cross-sectional size of this conduit is 526 mm2.  It is easier to simply use metric measurements for this.  The cross-sectional wire areas are found in Chapter 9, Table 5.  Chart of various conductor sizes and areas:

ConductorArea (mm2)Total conductorTotal area (mm2)
#2 THHN74.713224.13
#6 THHN32.71398.13
#8 THHN23.61247.22
#10 THHN13.619122.49
#12 THHN8.581977.229
#14 THHN6.258956.322

Thus, in order to break this up into two 1 and 1/2-inch conduits, the #2, #6, and #8 (main transmitter HV power supply, backup transmitter, and grounds) are run in one conduit, the remaining circuits in the other.  The idea is that the main transmitter and backup transmitter will not be running simultaneously for long periods of time.  Those cable areas total 369.48 mm2, well within the 40% limit of 526 mm2 for 1 and 1/2 inch EMT.   The rest of the circuit’s cable areas total 256.041 mm2.  That leaves room for additional circuits in the second conduit if future needs dictate.  The extra conduit area will make pulling the wires through easy.

From the square wireway to the HV power supply, 1 and 1/4 inch conduit will carry the three #2 and one #8 ground.  1 and 1/4 inch EMT has a cross sectional area of 387 mm2, the conductors contained within will be 271 mm2.  Less room here, but still well within the 40% limit.

Pictures will be posted when the project is done.

Moving the WRKI and WINE transmitter site

Blogging has been light due to workload being heavy, at the moment. We are engaged in moving transmitters out of this old house:

WINE 940 WRKI 95.1 former studio and transmitter site
WINE 940 WRKI 95.1 former studio and transmitter site

Into this new transmitter building:

WINE WRKI transmitter building at base of tower
WINE WRKI transmitter building at base of tower

The former building was the original studio for WRKI, 95.1 MHz, which signed on in 1957.  The co-located AM station, WINE 940 KHz, did not sign on until 1963.  As such, the building is a little worn around the edges, so to speak.  The FM transmitter has an auxiliary cooling device, for those hot summer days as the building itself is un-airconditioned:

WRKI Harris FM25K transmitter, circa 1986
WRKI Harris FM25K transmitter, circa 1986

The rest of the building is in similar condition.  Ceiling tiles are falling off the ceiling and getting ground into the floor, junk is piled up in almost every corner, rodent feces, and the basement, don’t even get me started on the basement.

The basic floor plan for the new building is simple:

WRKI WINE transmitter room floor plan
WRKI WINE transmitter room floor plan

Right now, the preliminaries are being done, mounting the coax switch, running conduit, pulling wires, etc.

A few design notes:

  1. This building is much closer to the tower, which is sited on a high hill (715 feet, 218 Meters) and sticks up 500 feet (152.1 Meters) above that.  Basically it is the area lightning rod, thus special attention will need to be paid to grounding and bonding.  I decided to isolate the electrical ground in favor of the RF ground for lightning protection.  This involves putting toroids on the electrical ground conductors.
  2. The building itself is shielded with continuous steel plating, but that has been cut in a few areas to install air conditioners.  Those areas will have to be repaired and the AC units bonded to the steel plate.
  3. Back up cooling will be in the form of a large exhaust fan and intake louver.
  4. The tower itself is AM radiator for WINE.  It is 170 degrees tall, which means high RF fields at the base, therefore good RF bypassing is needed.
  5. The transmitter room itself is fairly small for what needs to go in there. careful design and placement is required.

Here are some in-progress pictures:

WRKI backup transmitter, Harris FM3.5K, coax switch in the background
WRKI backup transmitter, Harris FM3.5K, coax switch in the background

The first order of business was retuning a Harris FM3.5K transmitter to function as the backup. The current backup transmitter is an RCA FM20E, which no longer runs. After the move is completed, that transmitter will likely be scrapped.

I attached super strut to the ceiling at four foot intervals. I used this strut to support the 4 port coax switch. All coax in the transmitter room is 3 1/8 inch hardline, which has a power rating of 40 KW.  Since the transmitter power output is 20 KW, this leaves a lot of head room for problems.  When working with a 3 1/8 inch coax, it is important to remember to cut the inner conductor 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 inches sorter than the outer conductor, otherwise the stuff doesn’t go together right.

The 30 KW air cooled dummy load was moved up from the other building and connected to the coax switch.  This allowed the backup transmitter to be tested.

WRKI backup transmitter and dummy load
WRKI backup transmitter and dummy load

Three inch ground strap connects all the transmitters, racks, and dummy load to the station ground.

WRKI ground strap, new transmitter building
WRKI ground strap, new transmitter building

Electrical requirements are being met by a 400 Amp service backed up by a 120 KW generator.  Once the conduit work is finished and all the wires pulled, the coax to the old building can be cut and brought into the new building, then the station can go on the air with the “new” backup transmitter.