Installations – Engineering Radio

Distance to Fault Measurements

The ability to do a Distance to Fault Measurement can greatly speed up the troubleshooting of potential antenna and/or transmission line problems. DTF measurements take on one of two forms; Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) and Frequency Domain Reflectrometry (FDR).

TDR is the traditional method of measuring Distance to Fault. The test equipment sends short DC pulses down the cable and measures any return loss or SWR. Energy reflected back toward the instrument will plotted based on the time difference between the transmitted signal and the received reflection, similar to RADAR. This works well finding opens or shorts, but may not see lesser faults that could still be causing problems.

FDR is now common in most field models of Vector Network Analyzers. An FDR sends a frequency sweep down the cable then uses an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function to convert the information into a time domain. FDR can more reliably detect smaller issues with cables such as kinks, sharp bends, water in the cable, poorly applied connectors, or bullet holes. The piece of dented cable above would not have given a large reflection on a TDR, but on an FDR it would show up very nicely.

Like a VNA, an FDR needs to be calibrated for the sweep frequencies in use. The frequency span or bandwidth of an FDR has a major role in DTF measurements. A wider span will result in more precise fault information, however, it will reduce the over all length that the instrument can test. For most broadcast RF applications, cable lengths are less than 670 meters (2200 feet). Many instruments will adjust the maximum distance automatically based on the chosen span and velocity factor.

For my equipment, a Siglent SVA 1032X, the maximum distance for any frequency span can be found with this formula:

Maximum Distance (meters) = 7.86 x 10⁴ x Velocity Factor/Span (MHz)

Thus, to get best resolution sweeping a cable that is 670 meters long with a velocity factor of 86%: 7.68 x 10,000 x .86 / 95 MHz = 695 Meters maximum distance.

The resolution for any frequency span can be calculated with the following formula:

Resolution (meters) = 1.5 × 10² × velocity factor/Span (MHz)

In this case, the resolution would be +/- 1.35 meters. For shorter cable lengths a larger span can be used for better resolution.

My preference is to center the sweep frequency around the channel or frequency of the system under test.

To use a DTF function, a few inputs are needed:

The velocity factor of the transmission line
Cable attenuation for the swept frequency in dB/Meter
The approximate length of the line under test

The cable velocity factor and attenuation can be obtained from the manufacturer’s data sheet. Keep in mind that the manufacturer’s data is an estimation. These are usually pretty close to the actual number, but may vary due to tight bends in the cable, any splices, transitions to different cable, etc.

I had this used 1/2 inch RFS LCF12 50J cable in the barn, left over from project. Fortunately this is newer cable and it had the length marked out in meters. The beginning number was 0980 meters, the end was 1021 meters. Each meter marking has an asterisk before the number. I used a meter stick to measure out the distance between the asterisks and they are exactly one meter apart. I then measured the distance between the asterisk and the connector on each and ended up with 1.49 meters (4.9 feet) additional length, making the total length 42.49 meters (139.4 feet). The manufacture’s specification on velocity factor is 0.87 or 87% of the speed of light.

When I test this line with a 50 termination, it looks like this:

FDR DTF, 50 ohm termination at 42.49 meters

When I test the line either open or shorted, it looks like this:

I swept the cable at HF frequencies (3-30 MHz) since I think that is what this is going to be used for. At 3 MHz, the cable has a loss of approximately 0.003 dB per meter, which is inconsequential for this test. The velocity factor of 0.87 is pretty close. A longer run might indicate that it is actually 0.875 or 0.88.

Velocity factor and cable impedance are very important when using the Moment of Methods (MOM) system for AM antenna work. In that situation, both need to be obtained with a VNA for the FCC application.

The best practice is to sweep into a terminated line. In an AM system, a termination can most often be applied at the ATU input J plug. Sweeping into an antenna is possible, however there are several things that may lead to poor results. Most often, an FM antenna will look like a short on a DTF measurement. A UHF slot antenna will look open. In addition to that, the DTF measurement may be corrupted by any signals being received by the antenna while the system is under test.

The Bext TFC2K broadband FM antenna

FM Broadband antennas are a compromise because they generally have less gain than tuned antennas, are more complicated, and take up more space. However, this antenna has none of those issues. The gain and radiation pattern appears to be almost the same as a tuned three-bay FM antenna.

We are finishing up an antenna project in Pittsfield, MA, this week.

The project involved replacing a Shively 6812 tuned to 95.9 MHz (WBEC-FM) with the TFC2K so that the W277CJ 103.3 MHz (WUPE) translator located on the roof of the 14-story Holiday Inn on West Street could be moved to the studio location. In this case, having the translator in-house will save significant rent. The new antenna will continue to serve as a backup facility for WBEC-FM when the main site is off the air for whatever reason.

The input power per bay is based on the antenna’s input connector. In this case, each bay has a 7-16 DIN connector and the power divider is a 7/8 inch EIA flange. Thus the maximum input power for this setup is 5.5 KW. The licensed output for both facilities is far below that.

According to the manual, this antenna should be spaced at 0.85 wavelength, which is frequency-dependent. I chose a frequency halfway between the two (103.3 – 95.9)/2+95.9 = 99.5 MHz. The formula from the Bext general antenna manual is:

D = (300/F) x 0.85

Where
D = the distance between center of radiating elements (booms)
F - Frequency in Mhz.

Thus, D = (300/99.5) x 0.85 = 2.56 meters (or 8′ 5″)

As this is a series excited AM tower, some type of broadband isolation coil is needed to cross the base insulator. This one is simply a large coil of 7/8 inch coax, likely with a capacitor across the outer conductor to create a resonant LC network.

To me, it looks like a water heater. Since the ground is frozen solid, we made a temporary stand. We will have to come back in the spring to create a permanent stand or perhaps a unistrut mount to the wall of the ATU building.

In the rack room, the transmitters are combined into a Bext FDCSDC2 star point combiner.

Broadband sweep shows a good match across the entire FM band. I will be interested to see how it performs with respect to the Shively single bay 6812 on the roof of the hotel (103.3 W277CJ).

Return loss, Bext TFC2K 3 bay FM antenna

The return loss looks good on both 95.9 and 103.3 MHz. The interference noted in the sweep is from local FM stations including the main transmitter for 95.9 MHz.

Baltimore Public Radio gets a new FLX20

Another liquid-cooled GatesAir transmitter installation was completed for WYPR, Baltimore, MD. This unit replaced a Continental 816 which had a long life.

The area around the transmitter site is not the best neighborhood. The building was formerly the WBAL-TV transmitter site and was built circa 1947.

Original four-legged Blaw Knox self-supporting tower from the WBAL-TV days

The transmitter room is a little tight, so it was difficult to get a good shot of the front of the unit.

The station is running HD Radio with -10 dBc.

This site has a strange 3-phase delta AC power configuration. The middle leg is at ground potential, and the other legs all measure 240 VAC to ground. I’ve never encountered that before. This is known as a corner grounded Delta, which gets rid of the high leg associated with most closed 3-phase delta systems.

Ultimately, all the leg-to-leg measurements are 240 volts, so the power supplies are satisfied. With these transmitters, the phase rotation does not matter because there are no actual 3-phase loads in the transmitter.

Inventory control, Home Depot Reisterstown Road, Baltimore, MD

The sign says “Free Tools.”

Installing a 60 KW FM transmitter

Recently, I installed this very nice GatesAir FAX60HD.

This project was for WPGC, Washington, DC. WPGC (Prince George’s County) is an Audacy station with a Hip-Hop and R&B format. I was listening to The Good Morning Show on my drive from the hotel to the transmitter site, and those guys were hilarious! It’s nice to hear a well-programmed radio station.

It is always fun to accept new and interesting challenges. This is, to date, the largest transmitter either AM or FM that I have ever installed. Previously, I installed several FLX-40 units, which is quite a bit of power for the FM side of things.

MSC unit with touch screen pad controls both transmitters and exciters

This transmitter combines two FAX30 transmitters and is controlled by an MSC unit. The content stream for HD comes from an FMXi4g, which has several great features.

This station’s TPO is 45.7 KW with the HD carriers at -14dBc. While this is a class B station with an ERP of 50 KW, the four-bay half wave-spaced antenna requires a lot of wattage to make that TPO. This is a largely residential neighborhood, which is, I surmise, the reason for the half wave-spaced antenna.

WPGC main and backup antennas, Capitol Heights, Maryland

I was told that this is not the greatest part of town. The station has had some theft of outdoor air conditioner equipment in the recent past. That being said, it is much nicer than many areas we normally work in the NYC metro area. The transmitter site has been here since the station signed on in 1948.

FAX60HD power supplies and power amps installed

It took a bit of time to install the 42 power supplies and 48 power amps. The power amps were installed in the same slots as during the factory test cycle. Thus the data on the test sheet matches the data seen on the transmitter GUI when we turn it on.

All of the cabinet interconnects; RF plumbing, grounding, AC supply, sample lines, and various control lines were completed.

Transmitter hybrid combiner for the two FAX30 transmitters

4 Inch Dielectric coax switch with 60 KW load

Most of the harmonics (2-10) looked like this. However…

This is something interesting that came up during the proof. When measuring the harmonics, most of them were in the -130 dB range. This one is slightly higher than that, which is due to the proximity of WFDC-DT on channel 15 (476-482 MHz), 1000 KW ERP about 10.6 miles away. Their signal was coming back down the transmission line from the FM antenna. This is a good demonstration of how other unwanted signals can get into the final sections of transmitters which can cause intermodulation mixing products. In this case, the FAX60 has several low-pass filters that remove this and other signals before that happens.

This is replacing a pair of combined BE FM25-T transmitters that were getting a little bit long in the tooth. The air staff has commented on the noticeable improvement of the station’s sound. The downside of tube transmitters is the delicate tuning procedure to reduce the AM noise. High-powered transmitter tubes are also getting more expensive and, for some types, harder to source.