After extensive testing of Both HD Radio and DRM, the Secretary of the Ministry of Communications Electronic Communications, Genildo Lins, said the tests of the two technologies have had poor results, especially high power FM . The testing demonstrated the digital signal coverage is approximately 70% of the current analog signal. “The future of radio is digital, but that future is not yet. We are unable to make a decision on these results.” A polite way of saying “This is not the digital radio we were hoping for.”
These are just a few brief excerpts of the FM HD Radio test reports from Sao Paulo. The method of testing:
The transmission system was located in the center of the city of São Paulo. The signal HD Radio digital broadcast was extended hybrid mode combined with the analog signal in the air, with separation of 163.8 kHz from the carrier’s analog FM signal and the carriers of HD Radio digital signal in sub-upper and lower sidebands. The power used in transmitter for the analog signal was 27 kW, and for the digital signal of 1 kW. Attaching the FM and HD Radio systems in their respective transmission antennas, the power Isotropic Effectively Irradiated (EIRP) of the analog signal was 112.3 kW and the digital signal of 1.12 kW. Thus, the protection ratio (EIRP power ratio between the analog and digital signals) was 20 dB (sic). During the measurement campaign, two commercial FM receivers were used analysis of analog reception, both to verify their potential impacts on receiving due the introduction of the digital signal, as to assist in verifying the coverage area of the signal analog.
The results of this testing:
Checking the results on each route, the route R1 radial (southeast direction), the stretch P1 to P2, that extends to 10.88 km (7.3 miles) of distance from the transmitter, the audio decoding was 71.6% of the digital audio frames received, and in the remaining sections of the route were little digital coverage.
In radial route R2 (southwest direction) was decoding of digital audio throughout the stretch to P1 P2, which extends up to 10.7 km (6.6 miles) of distance from the transmitter. In the following passage (P2 P3), the first blend was 17 km (10.5 miles) from the station. Following the passage P3 to P4, 26.4 to 44.9 km (27.9 miles), there was only 21.8% decoding of digital audio frames received within that stretch. In the last section (P4 to P5), from 44.9 km, there was almost no coverage digital.
In R4 route (northwest), there was decoding of digital audio throughout the stretch P1 to P2, extending up to 11.8 km (7.3 miles) of distance from the transmitter. In the following passage (P2 P3), from 11.8 to 24.9 km, was 62.5% of decoding digital audio frames received within that stretch. Following the stretch from 24.9 to 47.5 km (29.5 miles), (P3 to P4) the percentage was 24.3%. In the last stretch, from 47.5 to 61.7 km (P4 to P5), no digital coverage.
In route R6 (northeast direction), the stretch up to 9.8 km (6 miles), (P1 to P2) was 74.7% decoding of audio frames. In the passage P2 to P3 from 9.8 km to 29.8 km (18 miles) of the station, there was audio decoding 100% of the received frames. Following the stretch from 29.8 to 45.3 km (28.1 miles) (P3 to P4), the percentage was 87.2%, and in the last stretch, from 45.3 to 60.9 km (P4 to P5), the percentage was 47.9%.
Routes shown on a map:
Using unbiased real world testing, HD Radio does not look so hot. One caveat; the digital carrier level is -20dBc. That being duly noted, results show a 112 KW EIRP analog station with a 1.12 KW digital carrier that is unusable 6 miles from the transmitter site in some areas. It is almost hard to believe. Original documents can be found on the Government of Brazil Ministry of Communications website (in Portuguese). They are interesting reading, although you may need to parse them through the Google translator.
AM HD Radio (no surprise) and DRM have similar or worse results.
Thus the myth “Digital is better,” is called to question. I am not opposed to new technology, provided it works better than the technology it is replacing.
8 thoughts on “Brazil: The place where they test tech before it is implemented”
Thanks for sharing, Paul. It’s mean Digital radio still so far !
Giang, How is HD Radio doing in your country?
@Paul: In Vietnam, we still keep analog radio. The Government has not chose HD or DRM, although there were some digital low power trasmitters had been tested in Hanoi by Harris, Nautel in 2005.
“This is all a hell of a lobby to see how the owners of the media and its paper shufflers will earn more with the IBOC / HD Radio at the expense of the people, since the DRM is done by public broadcasters, honest, “open source”, and without patents.”
This is a comment at the bottom of the page translated. Some of the other reports on the site have revealed that especially the smaller, community broadcasters to not trust IBOC for good reason. IBOC seems to marketed mainly to Government-controlled media, and especially Communist ones at that. Mexico was ripe for IBOC.
Difference in this case between Brazil and us Americans is the Brazilians appear to have common sense. HD Radio and DRM= Epic Fail! You heard it here first.
All I can say is AMEN!!!
Kent Teffeteller –
Well said, Sir. Americans rejected HD years ago, a small well-oiled cabal of cronykasters keeps trying to reinflict it. It stinks.
Elza esse mérito é seu, você está de parabéns.
(Elza this is your merit, you are to be congratulated.)