Engineering Radio – Page 104 – One Hundred percent Human Generated Content for your Reading Enjoyment

Tower take down pictures

A few years ago, I was involved in removing and rebuilding an AM radio station tower in Gainesville, Florida. The old tower was a hollow leg tower that was rusting from the inside out. It was installed around 1960 or so, but the actual records were sketchy, as the original studio building burned down in 1984. In 2005, the tower climbers came out to relamp it and refused to climb it because one of the legs was rusted through. Therefore, a replacement tower was ordered and delivered.

Prior to starting work, a temporary wire antenna was constructed. Since there were two radio stations diplexed to this tower, it became a bit of a chore to get both signals (980 and 1430 kHz) tuned into the same temporary antenna. In the end, the components available could not create a good load for the 1430 station, so a separate temporary wire antenna was erected for that station. Both stations ran at 1 KW into their respective antennas until the new tower was finished.

WDVH, 980 Gainesville, FL. Top of tower coming down

Top section of a 240-foot guyed tower on its way to the ground. This tower had an inner and outer set of guy anchor points. The top section came down after the last guy wire on the outer anchor was cut.

Truncated tower.

Bottom section of tower on its way to the ground.

Tower on the ground. In keeping with the theories on tower failures, this tower fell within about 1/3 its height. The wire antenna supports and the new tower sections can be seen in the background. It took the tower company about a week to stack the new tower. This was done in July, therefore the average daytime temperature was about 100° F (37° C) with frequent afternoon thunderstorms.

Do radio transmitters have the capability of electrocuting copper thieves?

I found that question while perusing my search engine statistics today. The short answer in theory is yes. If you are a copper thief, it will most likely look like this:

That being the case, however, it is much more likely that an RF burn will result if one comes in contact with an energized antenna or transmission line. Even small RF burns are painful, large ones can be nasty things. RF burns occur because of the skin effect, that is to say, the higher the frequency of the AC waveform, the closer to the surface of any given conductor the current will flow. It is the reason why five-watt STL transmitters on 950 MHz use 7/8 or 1 5/8 inch cable to reduce losses.

When a human body part comes in contact with an energized RF antenna, the body part becomes part of the circuit, thus it follows the same principles. The extremity that is making contact will have its skin burned off. It also smells bad.

Getting an RF burn is a painful lesson on what not to come in contact with around a transmitter site. But, that is not all. Simply being in close proximity to radiating elements of antennas will induce body tissue heating, just like a microwave oven. This can lead to all sorts of short-term and long-term damage to organs and other problems.

Therefore, the best thing is to avoid radio and cellular towers if you do not know what you are doing. Stay out of fenced-in areas around tower bases. No matter how tempting that copper may look, you could be seriously injured or killed if you cut the wrong thing.

The General Electric XT-1-A AM transmitter

I found this photograph in a filing cabinet the other day as a part of a sales proposal dated 1948. I have never seen one of these in the field. They look like very sturdy units:

General Electric XT-1-A Standard Broadcast transmitter

Back in the day when AM was king, no expense was spared on transmitting equipment. I remember the GE BTA-25 transmitter from the same era, it was built like a tank. Once, while we were repairing the Harris MW-50A main transmitter, the old GE burped, sputtered, and threw an IPA overload, then returned to air. I looked in the IPA cabinet and found a mica capacitor had been blown in half. It was in the tuning circuit, but apparently, there was still enough capacitance in the circuit for the transmitter to keep running.

This unit looks similar to that one. The simplified schematic:

General Electric XT-1-A schematic diagram

Like other 1 KW AM transmitter designs, this unit uses the venerable 833A triode. There are some advantages of this tube, as extra circuits for PA stage neutralization are not needed. The full sales brochure can be found here (medium-sized .pdf). These were manufactured in Syracuse, NY.

The asking price in 1948 was $8.730.00, tax and shipping extra.

The PIROD PRLC-A tower lighting controller

PIROD tower company has been around for a while, thus there are likely many of these tower light controllers out in the field. They perform a vital service in controlling and monitoring tower lights at remote transmitter sites maintaining a safe operating environment for aircraft and compliance with FCC rules.

PIROD was sold to Valmont in 2004, Valmont no longer manufactures or supports the product. All is not lost, however, as XCEL Tower Controls does support it and parts are still available through them.

These units were fairly rugged, had good surge suppression on the incoming AC lines and are designed for easy access to service parts.

PIROD PRLCA tower light controller, WRKI Brookfield, CT

This particular controller is being installed at WRKI in Brookfield, CT. We are adding toroid cores to the tower lighting circuits coming off of the tower because the last controller has been mostly destroyed by lightning. It is a tall tower, on top of a tall hill, thus it gets struck by lightning many times over the course of a year.

The block diagram looks like this:

Click for higher resolution.

The basic schematic looks like this:

Click for higher resolution.

The entire manual can be found here, (medium sized .pdf) courtesy of John Brickley of EXEL tower controllers.