Paul Thurst – Engineering Radio

Audio Processing

Any radio station’s on air signal is its biggest marketing tool.

What sounds bad:

Over use of compression (gain reduction)
Over use of high frequency EQ
Over “equalization” on all frequencies
Over modulation
Overly aggressive composite clipping
Improper use of FM pre-emphasis
Poorly tuned transmitters (tube type)
Poorly matched antenna systems (all types)
Poor quality audio input
Over use of bit reduction on the STL
Analog STL’s that are off frequency
Playback of bad audio recordings

What sounds good:

Moderate use of compression to bring up audio levels for in car listening
Using equalization that suites format (e.g. more mid-range for all talk, more bass for urban, etc.)
Properly adjusted processor output levels for the correct modulation levels
Setting the pre-emphasis correctly
Tuning tube type transmitters for minimum distortion
Tuning antennas for adequate impedance and bandwidth
Making sure that audio input levels are correct, the audio is properly distributed and terminated with the correct impedance
Using STLs that have enough throughput that either no bit reduction or minimum bit reduction is used
Regularly check analog STL frequencies and re-adjust as necessary
Get rid of all bad audio recordings in the automation/playback system. Make sure that new files are from good sources and/or are re-recorded correctly

I took a little road trip between Christmas and New Years (Happy New Year!). I cannot help myself, I ended up tuning around the radio to see what was on. Suffice to say, I found the usual formats and a few locally focused stations. What struck me was the sound of some of the stations. While most sounded acceptable, if not somewhat generic, there were a few that had ear splitting, headache inducing audio. These stations were often over modulating and way over processed. It would have been better if there were no processing at all.

That got me thinking, what is or rather what should be the point of audio processing? Way back in the day, there were loudness wars. These were often program director ego induced efforts to sound louder than the competition because if you were louder, it meant you had more power. As listeners tuned their analog car radios from station to station, the signal that “jumped out” was mostly likely to attract more listeners. At least that was the way it was explained to me in the by a program director in the late 1980s.

We are no longer living in a listening environment where loudness is of huge importance. The number of audio sources has increased greatly; iTunes, Amazon Alexa, Spotify, Tune in, Pandora, YouTube Music, Sirius XM, iHeart, and AM/FM radio. Audio levels can be anywhere and listeners have gotten into the habit of raising or lower the volume as needed. Outside of program directors, (or whatever they are called these days) offices, loudness means next to nothing. If you asked an average audio consumer how loud their program sounded, they would not likely know how to answer you.

I believe what most people are looking for is an enjoyable listening experience. The most important quality of any type of audio processing is that the product sounds good. The problem is “sounds good” is very subjective. Perhaps a better term would be technically sounds good. The audio should be free from distortion and artifacts of CODEC bit reduction. Overdone AAC or HE-AAC has this strange background swoshy platform behind everything which is headache inducing. Instruments should sound as they do when heard live. In other words, Susan Vega’s voice in the original Tom’s Diner should sound like Susan Vega.

Next would be compensating for difference levels in program material. A bit of gain reduction so that those in mobile listening environments can hear all of the program material. Finally, some format specific equalization can be useful. That is it. Moderate use of various audio processing tools can certainly accomplish those things. Like everything else, too much of a good thing is bad.

WNPI-DT gets a new GatesAir transmitter

The public TV viewers in the St. Lawrence Valley get an updated transmission system. I recently finished installing this GatesAir ULXTE-6 transmitter in South Colton, NY. That is way up on the very northern fringes of the Adirondack Mountains. It replaces the Thales CCT-U-TDU2 8KW UHF TV transmitter, which was installed around 2004, early on during the analog/digital TV conversion.

South Colton, NY is home of Sunday Rock. According the the historical marker:

This glacial bolder (erratic), twice preserved by local citizens, marks the gateway to the “Great South Woods.” In frontier days it was said that there was no law or Sunday beyond this point. May all who pass this way continue to enjoy the beauty of the mountains.

This in the northern end of the lake effect snow belt, where the average yearly snowfall tops 6 to 10 feet. Sometimes there is continuous snowfall starting in November and ending when Lake Ontario finally freezes in late January or February.

Back to the business at hand; the new transmitter placed:

The 25 KW heat exchanger was placed where the old analog heat exchanger was:

This system uses 1 1/4 inch flexible tubing, which is easier to work with than the 1 1/2 inch steel reenforced tubing.

Measuring the Comtech mask filter with the network analyzer:

Old Dielectric dual mask filter for Thales transmitter

New mask filter mounted on the old dielectric mask filter stand:

This arrangement allows for the reuse of the two coax patch panels, on for antenna/dummy load, the other for main antenna/backup antenna.

3 inch rigid line between the transmitter and filter

Post mask filter RF signal analysis using a Rohde Schwarz ETL:

The GatesAir equipment always has good performance parameters.

The carrier frequency is measured using the pilot. In this case, both exciters have the GPS reference connected and working. I think the ETL OCXO might be 11 Hz low.

Anyway, this was a fun project.

One of These Days

The name of a song on Pink Floyd’s album, Meddle, released in 1971. The only lyrics in the song are drummer Nick Mason, who says “One of these days I am going to cut you into little pieces.” This was recorded at double speed with Mason speaking in falsetto, then played back at normal speed. Anyway, a good song from one of my favorite Pink Floyd albums.

And so it was for this Thales UHF TV transmitter. Installed in 2005 or so during the early transition to digital TV for PBS affiliate WNPI-DT.

Decommissioning a liquid cooled transmitter requires a few extra steps. First and foremost, as much as possible the antifreeze needs to be captured and collected for proper disposal. In this case, approximately 110 gallons (417 liters) of Dowtherm heat transfer fluid was drained into barrels.

Next, all of the RF modules and power supplies were removed from the transmitter. Both needed to be drained of HTF.

The outdoor heat exchanger presented a new problem:

It was attached to the concrete pad with hammer fixed anchors which needed to be ground off with a hand grinder.

It was a little bit chilly on a 10 F (-12 C) day, laying on the concrete pad, in the snow, under the heat exchanger with a hand grinder grinding the top of of eight little round bolts. After that was done, I managed to pry the legs loose and tip it slightly to get the rest of the HTF out into a bucket. I think the HE had about 15 gallons (57 liters) of HTF.

Next, all of the smaller sub assemblies were removed; the upper and lower RF module and power supply frames, the two control module frames, the rails that held the control modules, the AC power input and distribution frame and the controller frame and all the circuit boards. The RF module and power supply frames had HTF tubes and pipes that needed to be drained. The circuit boards are disposed of as E-waste.

The wiring harness was removed.

Finally, the stainless steel main cabinet frame was cut into manageable pieces with the battery powered sawzall (reciprocating saw) so that it could be carried out of the building.

All in all, it was a fun project.

WKIP; tune up on shorter tower

This tower was previously part of a two tower DA. The taller tower was taken down and slowly replaced with a monopole to facilitate vertical real estate development. The shorter tower was retained as the radiator for WKIP-AM, 1,450 kHz, Poughkeepsie, NY.

Knowing that the tower is 85 degrees at 1,450,000 Hz, I calculated the height above the base insulator to be 48.816 meters. The tower face is two feet or 0.6096 meters (this becomes important). Using the chart, we can see that the theoretical resistance should be about 25 – 30 ohms:

The bottom or X axis on this graph is the ratio of the antenna height over the antenna diameter or 48.816/0.6096 meters or 80.

The reactance is slightly less clear according to this chart:

Between 80 and 90 degrees, a large phase shift occurs due to resonance. That means the reactance could be either negative or positive, but will likely be a low number, say +/- 5 ohms. That may be why this height was chosen for the second tower in this system.

And now for a bit of reality; all of that theoretical information is nice, but a measurement under power is where the rubber meets the road. Using the trusty OIB-3, I obtained a reading of 48 ohms base resistance and +j 37.6 reactance. Thus the base current should be 4.56 amps at 1,000 watts.

It was a little tricky setting up the OIB-3. The only place for it was far back in the ATU meaning I had to be careful reaching around active components while getting a reading. That being said, it is only 1,000 watts and in the end, no new RF burns were acquired.

The new Delta Electronics base current meter confirms the measured base resistance with the use of Ohm’s Law; I = √(P/R).

The theoretical information is useful for checking the component ratings in the ATU. The series capacitor on the output leg needs to handle the full carrier current plus 125% modulation. I calculate that to be 10.125 amps, so the 12 amp capacitor is sufficient. In the end, the actual base current was about half of the theoretical, so all good. The ATU is a standard T network with a capacitive leg to ground.

While construction was underway both taking down the old tower and putting up the new monopole, the base impedance of the radiator changed several times. Thus, we waited until all of the construction was completed and the monopole was detuned.

The skirt wires on the monopole are doing double duty. They are first, detuning for the AM tower located about 57 meters (186 feet) away. Next, they are a backup antenna system in case that main tower becomes unusable. This can happen from time to time as the swamp floods or if any type of tower work is needed. To do that I installed another J plug with the detuning network, which will be the normal position. To switch to antenna, it is moved to the antenna position. The base current meter is on the output leg, so it can be used to detune the monopole or measure the station output power.

I used the analyzer to get the detuning network close to resonant. The second step involved using the base current meter to touch up the tuning with the transmitter running into the tower 57 meters (186 feet) away. This is necessary because the two structures are close together. The skirt wires on the monopole pick up a lot of RF, therefore the stray capacitance on the inductor coil plays a role in the circuit. The net result is less inductance is needed when the transmitter is on. The resonance point will shift somewhat with ground conditions, but as long as the monopole impedance is high (above say 2K ohms) the structure should be invisible to the nearby 1,450 KHz radiator.

Monopole detuned for 1,450 kHz; impedance is 4.07 K ohms, at or close to resonance

The ATU for the monopole looks like this:

The operating impedance measurement shows a 47 ohm impedance, making the daytime base current 4.61 amps. It is coincidental that the two tower impedances are that close.

The new base current meter agrees with the impedance measurement.