Care and feeding of Propane Fueled Generators

Broadcasters historically have tried to remain on the air during emergency events like major storms, earthquakes, and other forces of nature.  Oftentimes, commercial power is interrupted, and thus, the backup power generator is installed.  Propane-powered generators for medium duty (power up to 45 KW) are popular because of the decreased environmental hazards, availability and expense of fuel, and ease of maintenance and repair.  This sized generator can run the critical loads of a studio facility or a transmitter site with TPOs between 5 and 10 KW.

Katolight 45 KW generator w/outside housing
Katolight 45 KW generator w/outside housing

Most propane generators use a gasoline engine modified to use propane.  These generators can also use natural gas, however, because natural gas has slightly less energy, the generator’s service rating is reduced by about 10 percent.

Ford inline 6 cylinder engine
Ford inline 6 cylinder engine

The biggest error I consistently see with propane generators is improper fuel tank sizing.  It might seem just fine to plop a 500-gallon tank down next to a 45 KW generator and expect everything to be just fine.  500 Gallons may sound like a lot of fuel, but the more important consideration is tank vaporization, that is to say, how fast the liquid propane can be removed from the tank for use.  Propane fuel companies should be able to size these things correctly, most of them have books and charts that tell what capacities and sizes are needed.  However, as a general troubleshoot guide, the following information is provided:

Generator manufacturers will specify how many BTU per hour a generator will require under full load. If not, these are some conservative rules of thumb:

  • For every 1 KW of electrical generation, 2 horsepower of the engine is needed*
  • Under full load, each horsepower will consume 10,000 BTU per hour*
  • Propane has 92,000 BTU per gallon
  • Propane weighs 4.2 pounds per gallon

*Note: These are not the figures you will find in your engineering handbooks, they are adjusted for generator winding and engine efficiency.

Propane Tank Vaporization Rates (Continuous BTU/hr vs volume at tank temperature):

Size propane in a tank (assumes 1/3 full)Maximum continuous BTU/hr at degrees F
20°40°60°70°
120129,600188,640247,680308,160338,400
150146,880213,790280,700349,200383,520
250253,800369,400485,000603,480662,700
325321,300467,670614,000763,900838,900
500396,270567,700757,300942,2401,034,700
1000708,4801,031,2301,353,9801,684,6001,849,900
1450816,1201,253,4001,645,6902,047,5502,248,480

Note: Tank vaporization depends on fuel level, tank temperature, and withdrawal rate.  The above chart is a conservative generalization and represents a safe median value.

If a propane tank cannot vaporize fuel fast enough, the generator will begin to run lean, eventually overheat, and shut down. The vaporization rate depends on the tank temperature, which drops as fuel is withdrawn.  For the above-cited 45 KW generator called to duty after a severe winter storm, the tank would need to vaporize: 45KW x 2 HP = 90 HP.  90 HP x 10,000 BTU/hr = 900,000 btu/hr.  A 500-gallon tank is too small for that size generator.

As the tank temperature drops a propane tank can develop frost on the outside of the tank, even on a hot summer day, which compounds the problem.

The correct size tank for a 45 KW generator is 1000 gallons.  This can also be two five-hundred-gallon tanks connected in parallel via a high-pressure line.

45 KW propane generator with two 500 gallon tanks
45 KW propane generator with two 500-gallon tanks

Also note, the generator’s radiator is facing the tanks so that when the unit is running, hot air is blowing on the tanks, warming them up.  This particular generator is about 25 years old, which is why it looks a little worn.  It still carries the load and mechanically is in sound condition.

Most propane fuel systems have two regulators; one high-pressure regulator on the tank, which takes the variable tank pressure and steps it down to about 10 PSI, and the vaporizer which steps the pressure down to a few ounces per square inch (or inches of water column) and adds air creating propane gas for the generator to burn.

High pressure propane tank regulator
High-pressure propane tank regulator

It is important that the vaporizer be mounted above the snow line and that there is a little screen on the air intake, otherwise, mud wasps will build a nest in the air intake and the next time the generator is required to run, it won’t start.

Low pressure propane regulator/vaporizer
Low-pressure propane regulator/vaporizer

Fuel piping is also a concern, if the low-pressure lines are not large enough to handle the required BTU, the generator will run lean, creating the same problems as an improperly sized tank.  Different piping has different capacities, see the following charts:

Propane steel pipe sizing diagram
Propane Schedule 40 steel pipe sizing diagram
Propane copper pipe sizing diagram
Propane copper-K pipe sizing diagram

Assumes pressure less than 1.5 PSI, one MBTU is equal to 1,000 BTU per hour.

Once the generator is installed, maintenance is required.  As a minimum:

  • Exercise the engine bi-weekly for 15 minutes. Propane generators do not need to run under load.
  • Check fuel, oil, and antifreeze levels monthly, more often if heavy use.
  • Change the oil, oil filter, and air filter, and check the antifreeze freeze point, and battery electrolyte specific gravity yearly
  • Change out belts and hoses as needed, and pay close attention to the block heater hose, this is where leaks often develop
  • Clean out mice nests and droppings as needed

Mice love generators.

WE2XRH and the NVIS antenna

WE2XRH looks like an Amateur radio call sign but it is actually the call sign of an experimental short wave station in Alaska.  Transmitting DRM on 4.85 MHz, 7.505 MHz and 9.295 MHz with a Near Vertical Incident Skywave antenna system, they hope to cover all of Alaska and almost nowhere else with shortwave broadcast.

WE2XRH DART coverage with NVIS antenna system
WE2XRH DART coverage with NVIS antenna system

This license was granted for two years in August of 2008 and renewed again this September until  July 2012.  According to the website Nextgov.com:

The company told FCC that its initial tests would be funded by and conducted for the Defense’s Joint Electromagnetic Technologies program, a classified operation whose mission is to develop technologies for use by special forces and intelligence units.

Defense also will supply surplus transmitters from the closed, Cold War-era Over the Horizon Radar, located in Delta Junction. The radar system bounced shortwave signals off the ionosphere to detect aerial targets, such as Soviet bombers, at ranges up to 1,800 miles.

The transmitters are 100 KW Continental HF units, which for this applications are running about 20 KW.  According to this Yahoo Groups posting, several Japanese shortwave DXers have received the station in late 2009, but nothing recently.  I shot an e-mail off to their information address, but did not receive a reply.

On High Frequency (HF) NVIS has been used for several years where line of sight VHF communications are not possible.  Soldiers during the Vietnam war noticed that if a vertical whip was bent over so that it was horizontal to the ground, the signal strength was slightly less but the signals were much less prone to fading.

Near Vertical Incident Skywave antenna angle vs. distance
Near Vertical Incident Skywave antenna angle vs. distance

In this case, WE2XRH is using a crossed dipole antenna which generates a circularly polarized field.  With traditional HF skywave, polarization is not a factor since the ionosphere usually causes some field rotation anyway.  It is interesting that the system had this design consideration.

The NVIS is a novel approach and it may work on Medium Frequency (MF) during the night time, but daytime coverage would still have to rely on ground wave signal.  The FCC has historically approached MF skywave as a secondary and unreliable transmission method.  The idea being to reduce the antenna take off angle to as low as possible, hence the popularity of taller than 90 degree towers.  There is good validity to that practice as mixing the ground wave and skywave components at a receive antenna will cause multipath fading.

Setting aside a new broadcasting frequency segment, say 1.6 – 1.8 Mhz, a system could be designed to transmit DRM by using groundwave during the day with a traditional 90 degree tower, and NVIS at night with a horizontal dipole antenna.    Then never the two should meet.  The night time NVIS system would have a small ground wave component, out to a couple of miles.  In addition to that, the night time NVIS system can run on an adaptive power system, when propagation conditions are poor, more power can be applied to the antenna input and in better conditions, power reduced in accordance with a remote receive monitor that reports the Bit Error Rate (BER) back to the transmitter controller.

The best NVIS antenna is the 1/2 wave dipole positioned between 0.1 and 0.2 wave lengths above ground. In the 1.6  to 1.8 MHz band, that equates a half wave dipole antenna 260 to 292 feet long mounted between 66 to 90 feet above ground level.

This would have many advantages over the current directional antenna based MF broadcasting system currently deployed.  The current system is based on pushing potential harmful signals away from a station that was licensed to the same frequency (or an adjacent frequency) earlier.  This puts the onus for proper operation on the broadcast license holder.  Most don’t have the know how or resources to insure that a n AM directional is operating properly.  I would estimate at least half of the directional AM antennas in this country are out of tolerance.  With a NVIS based night time antenna system, coverage areas would be assigned much like an FM allotment.

The BBC conducted medium wave DRM tests in 2007 with satisfactory results during the daytime, but poor reception at night time due to co channel interference.  That is why DRM will not work on the current AM broadcast band and if digital radio is to be broadcast on MF, a new frequency band would be needed.

How the Cold War was won

This is not really apropos radio broadcasting, but it is about radio and it has a lot to do with engineering.  Back in the day, as a young man out to do whatever it was, I ended up being stationed on Guam, working at the Coast Guard radio station there.  That was interesting work, to be sure, but every morning and evening, either on my way to or from work, I would drive by this, which looked very interesting:

AN FRD-10 NAVCAMSWESTPAC, Guam
AN FRD-10 NAVCAMSWESTPAC, Guam

I had to lift the photo from a Navy Radio history site.  Back in my day, aiming or even possessing a camera around this area or building would likely inflict the extreme ire of the Marines, who attentively observed the area and were ready to call down a painful lesson to all not obeying the “NO PHOTOGRAPHY ALLOWED” signs.

Nicknamed “The Elephant Cage” it is a Wullenweber antenna used for high-frequency direction finding (HFDF) and was part of a system called “Classic Bullseye.”  There were several of these systems across the Pacific Ocean, and they all worked together using a teletype network.  The Army-Air Force version was called a AN  FLR-9, which was slightly larger.

AN/FRD-10 antenna layout
AN/FRD-10 antenna layout

There were two concentric rings of antennas, the tallest being the closest to the center building and used for the lowest frequencies.  It covered from about 1.5 to 30 MHz.  The rings consisted of several individual antennas, all coupled to a Goniometer with coaxial cables cut to identical lengths.  The outer ring had 120 vertical-sleeved dipole antennas, and the inner ring consisted of 40 sleeved dipole antennas.  The inner ring of towers also contained a shielding screen to prevent the antennas on the other side of the array from picking up signals from the back of the antenna.  A radio wave traveling over the array was evaluated and the Goniometer determined the first antenna that received the signal by comparing phase relationships.   The ground system was extensive.  Immediately under the antennas was a mesh copper ground screen.  From the edge of the copper mesh, buried copper radials and extended out 1,440 feet from the building.

The effective range for accurate DF bearings was about 3,200 nautical miles, which equates to about two ionospheric hops with the angle theta between 30 to 60 degrees referenced to the ground.

It was quite effective, it only took a couple of seconds to get a good bearing.  If the other stations on the network were attentive, a position could be worked out in less than 10-15 seconds.

AN FRD-10 transmission line diagram
AN FRD-10 ground diagram

It is a little hard to read, but this is the ground layout of the AN FRD-10 CDAA.  The transmission lines to each antenna are shown, along with the ground screen and building in the center of the array.

We Coast Guard types used this mainly for Search and Rescue (SAR) and the occasional Law Enforcement (LE) function.  I believe we actually saved a few lives with this thing.  I found the Navy operators to be very helpful, I think some of them enjoyed the change of targets from their normal net tripping.

The Navy operated AN FRD-10s at the following locations in the Pacific:

  • Imperial Beach, CA (south of San Diego)
  • Skaggs Island, CA (northeast of San Francisco)
  • Hanza (Okinawa) Japan
  • Waihawa, HI
  • Finegayan, Guam
  • Adak, AK
  • Marietta, WA

The Air Force/Army installed AN FLR-9’s in the following Pacific Locations:

  • Missawa AB, Japan
  • Clark AB, Philippines
  • Elmandorf AFB, AK

Basically, there was no corner of the Pacific Ocean that could not be listened to and DF’d.  Some people look back nostagically at the cold war when we “knew who the enemy was,” so to speak.  I am not one of those.  They either didn’t really know the enemy or have conveniently forgotten some of the less endearing qualities of the Soviet Union.

I believe all of these systems have been decommissioned and most have been taken down and scrapped.  The National Park Service studied the Waihawa, HI system as a part of their Historical American Building Survey (HABS HI-552-B2) (large .pdf file) before it was torn down.  Good technical description and building pictures.  Near the end of the report, it is cryptically noted that:

Beginning in the mid-1990s the NSG (ed: Naval Security Group), noting the absence of Soviet targets and wanting to cut costs and change the focus of its SIGINT collection, began closing FRD-10 sites… Undoubtedly, since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, listening posts have gained importance and most likely increased in number and sophistication. The FRD-10 CDAA at NCTAMS Wahiawa ceased listening in August 2004; it can only be assumed the closure occurred because there was a better way to do it.

Indeed.

The Guam site has been stripped out and abandoned, the latest photo I can find is from 2008:

Abandoned AN FRD-10, Finegayan, Guam
Abandoned AN FRD-10, Finegayan, Guam

And people think AM broadcasting is expensive…

The Devil is in the details

Sometimes it is the seemly small insignificant detail that will take a station off the air. To expound on that a bit, I have my own story which happened yesterday.  The back story is this:  About three years ago, some unauthorized tower climbers climbed the WICC south tower all the way to the top.  The station remained on the air at full power while this was going on.  Once at the top of the three hundred-foot tower, the climber, we can call him “Crack Head,” managed to loosen, then remove the beacon and throw it to the ground.  Mind you, this guy had no safety climbing equipment whatsoever and he had to stand on the top plate, which is all 20″ x 20″ square, of which the beacon takes up 16 inches.  A two-inch purchase between himself and eternity demonstrates that God does indeed smile on fools and drunks.

WICC south tower with long island sound in background
WICC South tower with Long Island sound in the background

Fortunately, his friend on the ground had a video camera and filmed the entire episode.  Even better, they then posted it on Youtube.   The police took interest in this video and its owners because the damage to the radio station was significant, and with the tower being about a mile away from the end of the Stratford Airport runway 17, presented a real hazard to air navigation.  Needless to say, the video was used by the prosecution and both crackheads are now in prison, God having limits after all.

A spare beacon was hoisted to the top of the tower and placed in service.  This beacon was quite old and leaky and continually failed, burning out the tower light flasher.  Thus, it was time to replace it.  We took advantage of the outstanding weather and the crew from Northeast Towers made quick work of it.  Removing and lowering the old beacon to the ground, then hoisting the new beacon up and installing it.  I goobered it by not taking pictures of the beacon fixtures flying up and down the tower.  I took the station off the air for about five minutes to check the condition of the wiring going up the tower, making sure there were no shorts up the tower or back toward the transmitter building.  While I was doing this, I overheard the two-way radio conversation between the tower climber and the ground crew on wiring.  It seems the old beacon had only two wires, hot and neutral.  The new beacon had three wires, hot, neutral, and ground.  Tie the neutral and ground wires together, instructed the tower boss.

Nothing more was thought of that, it sounded okay to me.  Unfortunately, the tower had other ideas.  About an hour after we secured from the job and drove away, the station went off the air.  It seems the neutral wire was not referenced to the tower previously.  Because now the neutral wire was tied to the top of the tower, the RF found a path to the ground via the tower lighting choke at the base of the tower.  It started arcing to its access door causing the transmitter to go off around 4 PM.  Equally unfortunate was the fact that the construction gate was closed and I had to get a boat ride with the harbor master, which took about an hour to arrange.  The entire situation was further complicated by darkness, which comes predictably around 6:30 PM this time of year.

When I arrived back out at the base of the tower, I took the metal access door off of the tower light choke cabinet.  I could see the fresh track marks all across the bottom of the door. With the door off, I turned the transmitter on.  Worked just fine.    I tried cleaning it off with a Scotch Bright, but to no avail, the transmitter would not run at any power level with the door in place.

Finally, the harbor master becoming impatient and darkness quickly falling, I taped a garbage bag over the tower light choke box with the door off and turned the transmitter back on.  The tower crew will have to come back and remove the ground wire on the beacon.

The first rule of troubleshooting: Check the last thing that was worked on first.

Update:  And look, here is the original story in Radio World: Tough times a Pleasure Beach.