The Generator and the UPS

An issue I had to deal with recently; was an unstable generator/UPS relationship.  When the generator was running under load, it surged repeatedly causing the UPS to drop out and not recharge.  Eventually, the UPS ran out of juice and shut down, killing the power to the Sine Systems remote control and telephone system.  Of the two, the remote control was the biggest pain to fix, as it lost its timed commands and would not reduce power at sunset for the associated class D AM station.

What went wrong?  This is a chart of typical problems with generators operating UPS loads:

SymptomPotential Problem
Fail to “lock on” to generator powerImproper generator frequency or voltage
Poor generator regulation
Unrealistic performance requirements
Instability of generatorVoltage regulator sensitivity
Control loop compatibility
Filter/control interaction
Governor or AVR problem
Fail to sync bypassMetering errors
Instability at specific load levelsControl loop compatibility
Instability at load changesControl loop compatibility
Metring errorsGenerator output voltage distortion
Loss of voltage controlExcess capacitance in filters vs. load

Table courtesy of Cummins Power Generation.

Generator excitation methods can be the culprit in many of these situations.  Generators often use one of three types of excitation for their field coils:

  • Shunt-excited SCR (silicon-controlled rectifier)
  • Shunt-excited PWM (pulse width modulation)
  • PGM (permanent magnet generator)

Of the three, the permanent magnet generator is the most stable since the AVR (automatic voltage regulator) is powered by a separate small generator which is unaffected by the load on the main generator output.  SCR and PWM both use the generator output windings, which makes them susceptible to load-inducted voltage distortion brought on by non-linear loads.  Therefore, in locations where large UPSs are known to be part of the load, PGM-excited generators are the best choice.

PMG generator diagram
PMG generator diagram

Sometimes, the generator is already in use before the UPS is installed.  In that case, there are some remedial steps that can be taken.  The speed which the voltage regulator reacts to changes in the load is often the culprit in many of these situations.  It may seem counterintuitive, however, the faster the AVR reacts, the more fluctuations there will be in the voltage and frequency.  A UPS can operate under a wide range of voltages and frequency, provided they do not rapidly change.

Depending on other loads, it may be necessary to dampen the gain on the AVR to slow it’s reactions down.  This will work if there are no large intermittent starting loads on the generator such as air conditioning compressors.

Another method would be to delay the UPS transfer to generator power until after all the other loads have been satisfied.  This will ensure that the generator voltage and current fluctuations are damped by the existing load.

The generator’s size needs to account for the equipment attached to the UPS and the battery charging load. With a larger UPS, the battery charging load can be significant. Generators that are improperly sized will not be made to work under any circumstances, hence the “unrealistic performance requirements” noted in the chart above.

You can read the entire Cummins Power white paper on generators powering UPS loads here.

The Raytheon RM-10 Monitor Amp

I found this manual from 1946 in the drawer at the WICC transmitter site, which is a sort of time capsule due to its inaccessibility. I figured I would bring it home and scan it, then return it to the file drawer out on the island.  Step one is done:

Raytheon RM-10 Monitor Amp
Raytheon RM-10 Monitor Amp

This is a cool little monitor amp, capable of driving line-level or speaker outputs up to about 10 watts or so.  It could be used as a front or input stage for a larger audio amp.  By the way, 10 watts is a lot more than it seems, if using efficient speakers to convert that power into sound waves.  Specs show total harmonic distortion is between 0.6 to 2 percent depending on power and frequency.  Lower power output levels net less distortion.

Schematic is pretty simple, a pair of 6L6’s in push-pull for the output.   Inverse feedback into the previous stage via the output transformer.  Click on image for higher resolution.

Full manual and parts list is available here.

Now I just need to get the manual back out there.

The Gates BC250GY transmitter

This transmitter is in service at WSBS, Great Barrington, MA as a standby. It was new in January 1975.

Gates BC250GY transmitter, WSBS Great Barrington, MA
Gates BC250GY transmitter, WSBS Great Barrington, MA

This was running into the dummy load for testing, which we try to do periodically.

Gates BC250GY AM transmitter audio section
Gates BC250GY AM transmitter audio section

The audio section is a pair of 8008’s 810s running in parallel. This goes through a modulation transformer to the RF section.

Gates BC250GY RF section
Gates BC250GY RF section

The RF section consists of another pair of 8008’s 810’s running parallel. The plate voltage for these tubes is 1,250 VDC which is fairly tame, all things considered. The transmitter is dirt simple 250-watt carrier power, 125% positive peak capable.  It is not the most efficient unit under the sun but it can still be repaired with off-the-shelf parts.

Gates BC250GY Schematic
Gates BC250GY Schematic

This is a somewhat faded schematic.  The schematic shows a single 833A as the final, however, this particular transmitter has a pair of 810’s for the final, as shown in the above picture.  Ham radio operators love these things as they are easy to convert to 160 or 80 meters for AM phone use. The bigger brother to this unit is the Gates BC1G, which is also a pretty simple unit using 833A tubes in parallel with 3,500 VDC plate voltage.

How much is prevention worth?

I sometimes get the distinct impression that the corner office doesn’t understand what it takes to keep a radio station on the air and in good repair.  It is most often the problems or “issues” that tend to get the most attention.  The things that are working well tend to get ignored. After all, how often do you hear a news report about the airliner that landed safely?

Lightning strike TV tower
Lightning strike, TV tower

When lightning strikes the tower and knocks the transmitter off the air causing major damage and expensive repairs, that is a problem.  When lightning strikes the tower and nothing happens, no problem.  What is the difference between those two situations?

Grounding strap, FM transmitter site
Grounding strap, FM transmitter site

If the generator starts and runs during every power outage and has done so for the last five years straight, it is obviously a reliable unit, does it need all that maintenance?

Caterpillar 75 KW diesel GENSET
Caterpillar 75 KW diesel GENSET

Money spent on preventing undesirable outcomes can be difficult to quantify as disasters and events that do not happen are ill defined.   It is difficult to quantify the “amount saved” on something that didn’t or won’t occur.  Using past situations is good start, but that only covers a fraction of possible outcomes.  In order to invest money wisely, one has to look at the probabilities.  If there is an unlimited budget, then the probability exercise should be minimal, however, there is very seldom an unlimited budget.

For example, how much does a back up STL system cost vs the risk of being off the air while the main STL system is being repaired?  How often do failures occur, when are they likely to occur and for how long are all good questions.  Is there an alternative to a full backup like an IP CODEC?  Such a solution would cover all aspects of the STL system including antennas, transmission line, transmitters and receivers.

There are certain FM stations north of here that have neither RADOMES or antenna heaters.  Once every two years or so, the antenna ices up and the transmitter folds back due to VSWR.  How much of an impact to listeners notice when this happens?  If it happened more often, say two to three times a year, would it be wise to invest in some type of deicing equipment?

What is the ownership and management opinion on off air conditions?  I have often heard tell “Oh, its only the AM, we don’t mind if it goes off the air.”  That is, until it actually goes off the air, then it is a big problem.

Based on my and others experiences, these are the things that will happen at an average transmitter site:

  • The electricity will go off at least once per year for several hours.
  • The main transmitter will fail at least once every two years.
  • Lightning will strike the tower at least once per year.
  • The STL system will fail, at unknown intervals.

At studio sites, these things will occur:

  • The file server will crash depending on the operating system
  • The telephone lines and or T-1 service, internet service, ISDN etc will go out
  • The electric power will go out for several hours
  • The satellite dish will fail once every two to three years
  • If there is a tower, it will get struck by lightning

Other site specific things can occur like floods, blizzards, earthquakes, fire, etc.

Money spent on backup systems for those items is good insurance.  Not only will the station stay on the air, the on call engineer’s phone will ring less often, which, if you are the on call engineer, should make you happy.

If a full backup is not available, a second transmitter for example, having a good stock of spare parts on hand can mean the difference between an early evening and an all nighter.   Keeping good maintenance logs and well documented repair records can point out trends and give a good basis for ordering spare parts.

Repair trends are important.  If the same part seems to be going bad over and over, it is time to dig deeper and find the cause of failure.

The old adage “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” still holds true.