The Emergency FM Replacement Antenna

Hurricane season is here. This time of year makes me fondly remember hurricanes of the past and the things we had to do to get stations back on the air; walking a mile down a sandy spit of land, wading through swamp water to get to the transmitter shack, being threatened with arrest by the Connecticut National Guard, blow drying RF modules with a hair dryer, sleeping in a camper for a week…  Ahhhh, good times, great times!

The one thing that I did learn if the disaster is big enough, expect none of the normal services to be functioning.  That includes things like gas stations, fuel delivery, grocery stores, restaurants, hotels, UPS, roads, bridges, telephone service, internet service, etc.

It is not a far-fetched scenario for the main FM transmitter site to be out of commission and will not be available or accessible for some prolonged period of time.  There might also be mitigating circumstances such as catastrophic tower failure, destruction of the transmitter building, flooding, or other major infrastructure disruptions.  In those situations, calling the broadcast supply vendor of choice for a replacement might not be an option.

It has happened before…

All of these things got me thinking about how to fabricate a reliable FM broadcast antenna from simple materials available on hand.  The FCC allows for temporary operation with an emergency antenna in part 73.1680, which reads:

(a) An emergency antenna is one that is erected for temporary use after the authorized main and auxiliary antennas are damaged and cannot be used.

(b) Prior authority from the FCC is not required by licensees and permittees to erect and commence operations using an emergency antenna to restore program service to the public. However, an informal letter request to continue operation with the emergency antenna must be made within 24 hours to the FCC in Washington, DC, Attention: Audio Division (radio) or Video Division (television), Media Bureau, within 24 hours after commencement of its use. The request is to include a description of the damage to the authorized antenna, a description of the emergency antenna, and the station operating power with the emergency antenna.

(1) AM stations. AM stations may use a horizontal or vertical wire or a nondirectional vertical element of a directional antenna as an emergency antenna. AM stations using an emergency nondirectional antenna or a horizontal or vertical wire pursuant to this section, in lieu or authorized directional facilities, shall operate with power reduced to 25% or less of the nominal licensed power, or, a higher power, not exceeding licensed power, while insuring that the radiated filed strength does not exceed that authorized in any given azimuth for the corresponding hours of directional operation.

(2) FM, TV and Class A TV stations. FM, TV and Class A TV stations may erect any suitable radiator, or use operable sections of the authorized antenna(s) as an emergency antenna.

(c) The FCC may prescribe the output power, radiation limits, or other operating conditions when using an emergency antenna, and emergency antenna authorizations may be modified or terminated in the event harmful interference is caused to other stations or services by the use of an emergency antenna.

In this situation, making a circularly polarized antenna would be overly complicated, so either a horizontally or vertically polarized antenna would be the most likely scenario.  There are a few antenna types that readily lend themselves to field expedient fabrication.

These are, in no particular order:

Of these, the 1/2 wave wire dipole is the easiest to construct.  Cut two wires, length (in feet) determined by the formula 234/Frequency (Mhz).  Attach one wire to the center conductor and one to the shield, stretch to the wires out and tune for minimum SWR by cutting or adding small lengths to the ends.  The total length for such an antenna would be approximately five feet and it could be mounted horizontally or vertically.  The issue with a wire dipole would be bandwidth and power handling capability.

A 1/2 wave dipole made from tubing would have better bandwidth and power handling, but tubing is a little harder to work with when it comes to tuning the antenna.

Frankly, if one is going to go through the trouble of using tubing to create an emergency antenna, the J-Pole (end-fed antenna with a 1/4 wave matching section) is probably the best.  This antenna is easier to tune, does not need to work against a ground plane, and has good bandwidth and a low take-off angle, meaning more power is radiated out toward the horizon, giving it a good deal of gain over both a ground plane and dipole antenna.  Additionally, when using standard RG-8, RG-214, LMR-400 or another similar transmission line, a well-matched antenna might be able to accept about 1 KW of input power, which would net approximately 4.4 KW ERP.  Not an insignificant sum, especially in an emergency situation.

Vertical radiation pattern for J-pole (1/2 wave end fed) antenna
Vertical radiation pattern for J-pole (1/2 wave end fed) antenna
1/4 wave ground plane vertical radiation pattern
1/4 wave ground plane vertical radiation pattern

There are many J-Pole antenna calculators available online, but many of them include a 20-inch or so section of tubing below the tuning stub that can be electrically coupled to the supporting structure.  This configuration defeats the main advantage of the antenna, creating a good deal of upward radiation.  It is a better idea to use a non-conductive support piece and keep any conductive materials at least 1/2 wavelength or greater from the radiating portion of the antenna.

The basic j-pole antenna looks like this:

J Pole (1/2 wave vertical antenna) diagram
J Pole (1/2 wave vertical antenna) diagram

The radiating part of the antenna starts above the tuning stub.  Basically, the 1/4 wave stub is shorted at the bottom, the feed point is adjusted away from the shorted end until a 50-ohm impedance point is found.  The center conductor of the coax is attached to the 3/4 wavelength section, while the shield is connected to the stub. The critical distances are the tuning stub length and the distance of the feed point from the shorting section.  I created an excel spreadsheet (.xls) that can be used to create all the lengths required to fabricate one of these antennas.  That spreadsheet can be had here: J Pole Calculator

Having a few moments of time to spare, I thought it would be fun to build one of these and put the analyzer to it.  I think testing things in the real world is a good exercise and I always enjoy working with antennas anyway.  Looking in the basement, I found some 3/4 inch copper tubing, a tee, an elbow, and a few end caps.  The complete list of parts is thus:

¾ copper tubing78-96 inches (196-244 cm) (frequency dependent)Main section
¾ copper tubing26-32 inches (66-82 cm) (frequency dependent)Tuning stub
¾ copper tubing2.5-3 inches (6.35-7.62 cm) (frequency dependent)Tuning stub short
¾ copper tubing2 inches (5.08 cm)Mounting section, bottom of T to MIP threaded adaptor
¾ copper T section1 eachT section for joining main section to tuning stub
¾ copper 90 elbow1 eachElbow
¾ copper end cap2 eachEnd cap on tubing
¾ to 1 inch copper MIP threaded adaptor1 eachAntenna Mounting
1 inch PVC FPT threaded adaptor1 eachInsulating mounting connection
1 inch PVCApproximately 20-25 inches (50-65 cm)Insulating mounting material
1 inch stainless steel hose clamps2 eachAttaching the coax to the antenna feed point
RG-8, RG-214, LMR-400 or other transmission lineAs needed, including 5-6 turns, six inches in diameter to form RF choke at feed pointRF choke needed to keep RF off of coax shield

One important detail to remember when using the above spreadsheet, the measurements are to the closest side and not the center.  Thus, if something measures 2.5 inches, it is metal to metal.  Some basic soldering skills are required, but assembly is relatively straightforward.  In a pinch, almost any conductive material could be used including aluminum, brass, steel, EMT, rigid conduit, or even iron pipe.

Parts cut to size for j-pole antenna on 87.9 MHz
Parts cut to size for J-pole antenna on 87.9 MHz
j-pole antenna assembled
J-pole antenna assembled
J-pole antenna on the antenna testing range
J-pole antenna on the antenna testing range

I made this particular J-pole antenna on 87.9 MHz because I didn’t feel like chopping up all my 3/4-inch tubing.  Cutting and soldering the tubing took about half an hour.  Designing and fabricating the feed point system for another half an hour.  I’ll throw another hour in for rounding up the parts, tools, etc.  Thus, the entire antenna was constructed in about two hours.  I used my AIM 4170D to find the proper feed point.  If I were going to actually use this antenna, it would then be a matter of finding a mounting location and running the transmission line.

J-pole antenna analysis results
J-pole antenna analysis results

Actually, I was less than happy with this. While the antenna is nice and broad across several channels, there are 16 ohms of inductive reactance that is impossible to get rid of. That gives an SWR of 1.4:1, which is not great.  With that kind of load, I would be reluctant to run more than a couple of hundred watts into this antenna. The interesting thing is, that graph is the first one, with everything set as calculated in the spreadsheet.  After that, I could make the impedance and reactance worse, but not better.

Still, in a pinch, I would use this antenna until something better could be found.


As promised, a picture of the feed point:

J-pole feed point connections
J-pole feed point connections

The hose clamps are not optimum, I am sure a better way to attach the feed line to the antenna can be fabricated, but again, I was thinking of an emergency situation and the parts which may be available from local sources.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8 thoughts on “The Emergency FM Replacement Antenna”

  1. Neat tutorial, thanks for posting it! An adjustable length J-Pole would be a useful addition to the truck of anyone who has multiple sites to tend to. Doesn’t seem like it would be too challenging to modify this to that, though the field tuning might be a bit more fiddly… now you’ve got me thinking!

    Any chance you could post a close-up picture of the feed point? I’m interested to see how that was made up. Thanks!

  2. Joe the plumber,take a long walk off the RF Cliff!
    Seriously,that’s outstanding creativity and engineering Paul!
    I gotta figure out that feed stub when I have some time.
    Tips on Transition from existing coax connection or what’s left of it ?

  3. Excellent idea to have this stuff on hand over here in tornado country too.
    If you add an adjustable shorting stub across the bottom of the j you may be able to tune out the +j. That’ll give you two tuning adjustments, stub length and feed point.

  4. I will see if I can take a picture of the feed point and update the post over the weekend. The idea is to make the antenna with things that are laying around or available at the local hardware store.

    Elliot, the best way to transition would be some type of adaptor to an N type connector. Barring that, I would run a new run of RG-8, RG-214 or LMR-400 from the transmitter to the temporary antenna. Regarding the feed point: it is basically a piece of transmission line that is shorted on one side. At 1/4 wavelength, the open end impedance will be very high, on the order of several thousand ohms. The shorted part will look like a short. By moving the feed point toward the open end, a 50 ohm (or in fact, any ohm) impedance can be found.

    Chuck, I think you are right. It would be interesting to experiment more with the tuning stub feed point, but I am out of time for now.

  5. Very good information about having an emergency antenna on hand before it is needed.

    One comment about those radiation patterns: they appear to be NEC “far field” patterns, which show the fields existing at an infinite distance over a flat ground plane of infinite extent. They show zero field in/below the horizontal plane, which won’t permit ~accurate estimates of their performance as a useful VHF/UHF broadcast antenna.

    Probably better to plot such patterns in a free-space environment to find their gain toward and just below the horizontal plane — which then can be converted to their ERP for a given input power and used with the FCC FM/TV propagation curves.

  6. Excellent article of the j pole antenna, it would be possible to stack 2 or 4 antennas as is usually done with dipoles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *