Partly for my own edification, partly just because, here is some information about AM antenna systems and their bandwidth. An AM tower is a radiator which, simply by the physical constraints of the tower structure itself, is pretty narrow banded, even under the best conditions. Add to that, antenna tuning units, transmission line phasing, antenna phasing units, diplexing units and things can get very squished outside of the immediate carrier frequency. This seems to be a particular problem with directional antennas, which most AM stations employ.

As an engineer, you can get some idea of how narrow an antenna system’s bandwidth is by looking at the base impedance measurement.  Every AM station is required to keep the latest impedance measurement on file.  When looking at these measurements, there will be on curve which indicates base resistance (R) and another curve that indicates reactance ( X, although often noted as + or -j).  If the resistance and or reactance curve is slopped steeply at the carrier frequency and out to 20-30 kHz, it is a narrow tower.  Add to that the differing phase shifts of an ATU and or Phasor and things will be compounded.  That is why it takes a professional to design and tune up these things, a poor design will never sound right.

Another way to get some idea of bandwidth requires a field strength meter.  Modulate the transmitter with a 10 kHz tone at 50% modulation.  Then, away from the near field, measure the carrier and 10 kHz +/- the carrier frequency on the log scale.  The side bands should be symmetrical and about 1/4 the carrier level.

Generally speaking, antenna systems need to be designed for low VSWR across the entire side band range (+/- 10 kHz from carrier) as well as symmetrical distribution of radiated energy across the lower and upper sidebands.  Several factors influence these conditions:

1. Electrical tower height, perhaps the hardest thing to change once a tower is constructed.  Short towers (less than 80 electrical degrees), or very tall towers, (taller than 200 electrical degrees) present problems.  If one where constructing an AM station and could choose any tower height, something between 120 to 190 electrical degrees would be ideal.  Existing towers can be top loaded to add electrical height for an additional 30 degrees or so.  Beyond 30 degrees it becomes difficult to physically attain and therefore impractical in most situations.  Top loading and bottom loading a tower can reduce bandwidth if done improperly.   Bottom loading an AM tower is almost never done due to the very high voltage and current as the electrical length approaches 180°.
2. Antenna matching networks can greatly improve or degrade bandwidth, depending on how they are designed.  A T matching network has more parts and is more expensive, however, it allows for optimum control over the R and jX phasing.  This becomes much more difficult with directional antenna where phase considerations are a part of the stations antenna field pattern development.
3. Phasors present the biggest challenge, particularly in the power divider sections.  A tank circuit power divider is the worst choice, a shunt circuit power divider is the best bandwidth choice, however, it is the hardest to conceptualize.

Obviously, the more complicated the antenna system, the harder it will be to keep the bandwidth open over 20 kHz of spectrum.  This is especially true on lower frequency AM signals, where the bandwidth is a much larger percentage of the frequency.   Multiple pattern, multiple tower DAs are a nightmare.  Single tower non-directional stations are the easiest to modify.

As far as the circuit itself, higher Q circuits have smaller bandwidths.  Simply stated, in an alternating current circuit, Q=X/R.  The better the reduction of X, which also has a lot to do with the relationship of the current and voltage phasing, the better the Q will be.  This is why a T network is the best design for an ATU.  With a 90° or 180° tower, this is relatively straight forward.  In towers that are shorter or taller than that, it becomes more difficult as the value of R becomes less friendly.

In most cases, some sort of L/C network can be deployed to decrease the Q of an antenna system at the base of the tower.  Directional stations also need to have the phasing equipment looked at, because, as noted above, certain designs can created bandwidth bottlenecks.  All in all, it is usually an expensive proposition for a multi tower directional station to broadband it’s antenna system.  This is another reason why IBOC on AM is destined to fail, many AM towers cannot pass the extended sidebands adequately.

## 3 thoughts on “Broadbanded AM antennas”

1. J.Aegerter says:

This is one reason why I like the “Folded-Unipole” design. If done correctly, they are fairly broad. Unfortunately for the greatest field strength, a 1/2 or 5/8 wave tower in height is necessary. Directional arrays with all of their lumped constants are the most challenging to broadband.

2. mouseanon says:

Folded unipoles mostly increase the effective diameter of the tower, which also increases the apparent bandwidth. In fact, the unipole kit can just be installed, shorted to the tower, and you’ll get the same or better results by continuing to series feed the tower. The high reactances at folded unipole feed points cause more trouble then they are worth.

Kintronic Labs did a study of this awhile back. The published paper (it was presented at the NAB convention) is on their website.

A properly designed DA phasing system can be very broad. The bigger problem is pattern bandwidth…maintaining nearly the same pattern shape and size across +/- 10 KHz is an art.