Engineering Radio – Page 57 – One Hundred percent Human Generated Content for your Reading Enjoyment

Troubleshooting an AM array

Today, there will be a quiz.

Recently, we had an AM antenna array go out of tolerance by a good margin. This has been repaired, however, I thought I’d post this information and see if anybody could identify the problem and the solution. Unfortunately, I don’t have prizes to give away, however, you can show off your AM engineering prowess.

All of the information is pertinent:

The station has two directional arrays (DA-2) using the same towers; the nighttime array is out of tolerance, and the daytime array is not affected and is performing normally.
There were no weather events connected with this event; no electrical storms, no major temperature changes, no rain events, no freezing or thawing, etc.
The problem happened all at once, one day the array was performing normally, and the next day it was not.
Station management reports that some listeners were complaining that they could no longer hear the station.
The ATUs and phasor were inspected; all RF contactors were in the proper position, no damaged or burned finger stock and no evidence of damaged components (inductors or capacitors) was observed. Several mouse nests were cleaned out of the ATUs, however, this did not change the out-of-tolerance antenna readings.
The towers are 1/4 wave (90 electrical degrees) tall.

Readings:

Tower	Phase angle as licensed	Current ratio as licensed	Phase angle as read	Current ratio as read
1	147.2	0.583	149.5	0.396
2 (reference)	0	1.00	0	1.00
3	-137	0.493	-125.8	0.798
4	107.5	0.481	92.7	0.355
5	-38.1	0.737	-60.2	0.623
6	-178.7	0.382	142.8	0.305

Licensed values for common point current is 13 amps, impedance is 50 ohms j0 and there is normally no reflected power on the transmitter. On this day, the common point current readings were 8.9 amps, impedance 38.5 ohms +j5 the transmitter had 340 watts of reflected power.

This is the overall schematic of the phasor and ATU:

WDGJ overall RF schematic diagram — WGDJ overall RF schematic diagram, click for higher resolution

Aerial view of the transmitter site, oriented north:

WGDJ aerial view showing towers as identified in schematic diagram — WGDJ aerial view showing towers as identified in the schematic diagram

So, where would you begin? Ask questions in the comments section.

WMHT’s former analog transmitter

During the digital TV conversion in the US, all broadcast television stations installed new transmitting equipment and antennas. Most stations ended up on a different frequency than their original analog channel. In Albany, New York, all of the TV stations moved to a common transmitter site and installed their antennas on a single tower.

Albany DTV tower, home of WRGB, WTEN, WNYT, WXXA, WMHT, and WCWN

For more on the Albany DTV site, check out the NECRAT page: www.necrat.us/albdtv.html

So, what happened to the old Analog TV sites in Albany?

For the most part, after the analog turn-off on June 12, 2009, the sites have sat empty. Such is the case with the former WMHT site.

Sign outside of former WMHT transmitter building

This old sign about sums up the end of analog television.

Former WMHT analog transmitter wide shot

The former transmitter operator desk. The maintenance log is still open. From the looks of things, they opened the circuit breakers and walked away. Everything remains intact from the antenna to the klystrons and exciters. It does appear that the coolant has been drained from the system. Other than that, it seems like the whole thing could be restarted with minimal effort.

Former WMHT Onan DFN 350 backup generator

There were two Onan DFN 350 backup generators. With a TV transmitter, running the cooling system after shutdown is vital. The idea here is that both generators in parallel could run the whole station, if one generator failed, then the cooling system would still run and cool the klystrons.

Former WMHT tower, wave guide and WVCR antenna — Former WMHT tower, waveguide and WVCR antenna

The former WMHT tower, which currently holds the WVCR-FM, WXL-34 (NOAA weather radio), and W44CT-D (Three Angles Broadcasting) Low power TV transmitter.

Current site occupants; WVCR-FM and W44CT-D

These equipment racks and the NOAA weather radio transmitter in the other room are the only active equipment at this site.

WMHT-TV Chanel 17 (488-494 MHz) was signed on 1962 from this site. The Comark transmitter was installed in 1984. The station’s analog ERP was 2000 KW visual, 200 KW aural.

It is an interesting site.

North Adams Tower Collapse

High winds seem to be the culprit in the collapse of two towers in North Adams. According to the Motorola system technicians, it happened at about 12:30 am Sunday morning, which is when all their link loss alarms started going off. The larger, self-supporting tower broke from its mounting plate and tipped over into the smaller guyed tower next to it. Effected are WUPE-FM and W226AW (WFCR New England Public Radio) as well as NEPR’s new station WNNI which has not officially signed on.

Cellular service for ATT, Verizon, and Sprint/NEXTEL were all knocked offline as well as internet services and E911 dispatch. Those services are coming back online, with temporary modular cell units en route. N

Here are some pictures:

WUPE-FM WNNI and W266AW transmitter building — WUPE-FM, WNNI, and W266AW transmitter building

Tower base mounting plate, apparent failure point

For pictures of the towers during happier times, refer to this post: Filtering for co-located FM transmitters.

Restoration work is underway with WUPE-FM expected to return to the air at low power by Monday afternoon.

Update:

WUPE-FM was returned to air at low power by about 1pm on Monday 3/31. We took an unused Shively 6812 antenna that was tuned to 94.1 MHz and retuned it to 100.1 by cutting 1/4 inch pieces from the end of the elements until it was on frequency. It took a bit of doing, but with a network analyzer, we were able to get it to 1.2:1 SWR with symmetrical sidebands. Running 600 watts, it covers the city of license and then some.

The STL antenna is a survey antenna mounted on the side of the building. In this configuration, with the leaves off of the trees, we are getting about 250 uV signal, which is pretty good.

The site is now crawling with insurance investigators, cell site technicians, North Adams fire department, Berkshire County Sheriff’s officers, tower workers, etc. After we finished this work, we cleared out to make more room for everybody else. Estimated restore time for W266AW is Wednesday 4/2.

Planning for the replacement tower is already in progress, I’d expect it to happen fairly quickly. The next step for the broadcasters is to put up a 70-foot utility pole and get a full-powered antenna for WUPE. This should happen in the next two weeks or so. That will serve as the temporary facility until the new tower is constructed.

Filtering for co-located FM transmitters

Well-sited FM transmitter locations usually want some height above average terrain. This means either a tall tower or a high hill or mountain. Once a site is developed, co-location of other FM transmitters often happens because sites are expensive to develop. A second station can save money by using existing facilities.

For all those newly permitted LPFM stations; pay attention. If you are going to be co-located at an existing FM broadcast site, you may need to do this too.

Interference from intermodulation mixing products can develop when FM transmitting antennas are in close proximity. This is especially true with solid state, broadband PA commonly used in today’s VHF FM transmitters. Thus, when antennas are closely placed, external filtering is required.

WUPE FM transmitter site, North Adams, MA

This is the case with a current project in North Adams, Massachusetts. New England Public Radio is placing WNNI on the air from the WUPE-FM site. WNNI is using one of those new Harris (now GatesAir?) Flexiva transmitters and WUPE-FM uses a Crown FM-2000A. The antennas are on separate towers, but the towers are in very close proximity, about 30 feet apart. In order to avoid any possible problems, a Shively 2602-3A-FB 3 pole filter was installed on each station. The filter is a bandpass for the station installed and a notch for the other station.

The primary concern here is mixing products between the two transmitters. Both have broadband solid-state amplifiers with low-pass filters before the output connector. There are three frequencies of interest;

(F1 – F2) + F1 or (100.1 MHz – 98.9 MHz ) + 100.1 MHz = 101.3 MHz
F2 – (F1 – F2) or 98.9 MHz – (100.1MHz – 98.9MHz) = 97.3 MHz
F2 + F1 or 100.1 MHz + 98.9 MHz = 199 MHz

That, plus harmonic measurements out to three or four harmonics of the fundamental frequency should be enough to demonstrate compliance with FCC out-of-band emissions standards.

Measurements on these frequencies must meet the emissions standards outlined in FCC 73.317 (d), which states:

Any emission appearing on a frequency removed from the carrier by more than 600 kHz must be attenuated at least 43 + 10 Log10 (Power, in watts) dB below the level of the unmodulated carrier, or 80 dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation.

It is also noted that this site has several cellular carriers and no doubt has or will have LTE at some point. We all know that rural LTE installations can create self-induced problems, which are then conveniently blamed on the nearest broadcast station because, hey, why not?

To further complicate matters, New England Public Radio also has a translator, W266AW (101.1 MHz) on the same tower as WNNI. The same measurements noted above must be repeated for the translator.

WNNI equipment rack. This is one of those new Harris (GatesAir?) Flexiva FM transmitters.

WUPE FM filter installation

WNNI 4 bay half wave spaced Shively antenna. Antenna for W266AW below

New WNNI antenna mounted on cell tower next to WUPE-FM tower. The W266AW translator antenna is directly below WNNI’s main antenna.

WUPE-FM 3 bay half wave spaced Shively antenna

WUPE-FM antenna installed on the original broadcast tower. I believe the tower dates from 1959 or so.

It is important to get this type of installation right the first time. Creating interference all around or above the FM band is never a good strategy. Going back to ask for more funds to make something right is also highly frowned upon.