Broadbanded AM antennas

Partly for my own edification, partly just because, here is some information about AM antenna systems and their bandwidth. An AM tower is a radiator that, simply by the physical constraints of the tower structure itself, is pretty narrow-banded, even under the best conditions. Add to that, antenna tuning units, transmission line phasing, antenna phasing units, diplexing units, and things can get very squished outside of the immediate carrier frequency. This seems to be a particular problem with directional antennas, which most AM stations employ.

WGY 810 kHz, Schenectady, NY transmitting tower w/open feed line
WGY 810 kHz, Schenectady, NY transmitting tower with open transmission line

As an engineer, you can get some idea of how narrow an antenna system’s bandwidth is by looking at the base impedance measurement.  Every AM station is required to keep the latest impedance measurement on file.  When looking at these measurements, there will be one curve that indicates base resistance (R) and another curve that indicates reactance ( X, although often noted as + or -j).  If the resistance and or reactance curve is slopped steeply at the carrier frequency and out to 20-30 kHz, it is a narrow tower.  Add to that the different phase shifts of an ATU and or Phasor and things will be compounded.  That is why it takes a professional to design and tune up these things, a poor design will never sound right.

Another way to get some idea of bandwidth requires a field strength meter.  Modulate the transmitter with a 10 kHz tone at 50% modulation.  Then, away from the near field, measure the carrier and 10 kHz +/- the carrier frequency on the log scale.  The sidebands should be symmetrical and about 1/4 the carrier level.

Generally speaking, antenna systems need to be designed for low VSWR across the entire side band range (+/- 10 kHz from the carrier) as well as symmetrical distribution of radiated energy across the lower and upper sidebands.  Several factors influence these conditions:

  1. Electrical tower height is perhaps the hardest thing to change once a tower is constructed.  Short towers (less than 80 electrical degrees), or very tall towers, (taller than 200 electrical degrees) present problems.  If one were constructing an AM station and could choose any tower height, something between 120 to 190 electrical degrees would be ideal.  Existing towers can be top-loaded to add electrical height for an additional 30 degrees or so.  Beyond 30 degrees it becomes difficult to physically attain and therefore impractical in most situations.  Top loading and bottom loading of a tower can reduce bandwidth if done improperly.   Bottom loading an AM tower is almost never done due to the very high voltage and current as the electrical length approaches 180°.
  2. Antenna matching networks can greatly improve or degrade bandwidth, depending on how they are designed.  A T-matching network has more parts and is more expensive, however, it allows for optimum control over the R and jX phasing.  This becomes much more difficult with directional antenna where phase considerations are a part of the station’s antenna field pattern development.
  3. Phasors present the biggest challenge, particularly in the power divider sections.  A tank circuit power divider is the worst choice, and a shunt circuit power divider is the best bandwidth choice, however, it is the hardest to conceptualize.

Obviously, the more complicated the antenna system, the harder it will be to keep the bandwidth open over 20 kHz of spectrum.  This is especially true on lower-frequency AM signals, where the bandwidth is a much larger percentage of the frequency.   Multiple patterns, multiple tower DAs are a nightmare.  Single-tower non-directional stations are the easiest to modify.

As far as the circuit itself, higher Q circuits have smaller bandwidths.  Simply stated, in an alternating current circuit, Q=X/R.  The better the reduction of X, which also has a lot to do with the relationship of the current and voltage phasing, the better the Q will be.  This is why a T network is the best design for an ATU.  With a 90° or 180° tower, this is relatively straightforward.  In towers that are shorter or taller than that, it becomes more difficult as the value of R becomes less friendly.

In most cases, some sort of L/C network can be deployed to decrease the Q of an antenna system at the base of the tower.  Directional stations also need to have the phasing equipment looked at, because, as noted above, certain designs can create bandwidth bottlenecks.  All in all, it is usually an expensive proposition for a multi-tower directional station to broadband its antenna system.  This is another reason why IBOC on AM is destined to fail, many AM towers cannot pass the extended sidebands adequately.

I will miss the CBC when they turn off their last AM transmitter

200px-CBCRadioOne.svg

I am listening to CBC Radio One’s Saturday Night Blues program.  Yet another good radio show that comes in here via skywave from CBE in Windsor, Ontario.   It is in the process of migrating to the FM band, channel 248B (97.5 MHz) after which the AM station will be turned off after a three-month simulcast.  I know I can stream this program, but that is a pain because it slows my computer down, plus, it does not sound as good coming from the computer speakers as it does from the AM radio even with the occasional fade.

According to the FCC website (yes, the FCC has records of Canadian, Mexican, Cuban, and Bahamanian radio stations), it is a class A station with a 2-tower directional, 1/2 wave towers with 10,000 watts, unlimited.  Pattern nulls to the south with a big fat main lobe north, east, and west.

I wonder what they are going to do with the transmitter when they turn the station off.  I wonder what kind of transmitter it is, sounds like a tube unit to me.  Certainly sounds good with that old blues music tonight.

IBOC update

Since the FCC approved a tenfold increase in the radiated power of the digital carrier, a progress report on the digital radio rollout is in order.  The FCC report and order (MM Docket No. 99-325) give us some background:

An original goal of the developers of the hybrid FM IBOC DAB system was replication of FM analog coverage without adversely affecting either the host analog signal or adjacent channel analog FM operations. iBiquity and several independent parties conducted extensive field and laboratory tests. Based on the National Radio Systems Committee (“NRSC”) evaluation of those test results, iBiquity requested and the NRSC approved an FM Digital ERP of one percent of FM Analog ERP (20 decibels below carrier (-20 dBc)).

And (after paying gobs of license fees and installation costs):

Many FM stations promptly commenced hybrid FM IBOC operations. Despite the rigorous testing, it soon became apparent that hybrid FM IBOC digital coverage often did not replicate analog coverage, especially in mobile and indoor environments.

Therefore (Fox, here are the keys to the hen house, knock yourself out):

Based on the results of the experimental operations with increased FM Digital ERP and other studies, on June 10, 2008, a group consisting of 18 radio group owners that operate over 1,200 commercial and noncommercial educational (“NCE”) FM stations and the four largest broadcast transmission equipment manufacturers, identifying themselves as “Joint Parties,” requested (the “Joint Parties Request”) that the Commission generally increase maximum permissible FM Digital ERP10 from one percent of a station’s authorized analog ERP (-20 dBc) (1% FM IBOC Power”) to a maximum of ten percent of a station’s authorized analog ERP (-10 dBc) (“10% FM IBOC Power”).

Based on (We find these hens are delicious!):

NPR concluded that at 1% FM IBOC Power, the mobile, indoor and portable digital coverage achieved by most FM stations would not replicate analog coverage, but that at 10% FM IBOC Power most FM stations could achieve digital mobile, portable and indoor coverage levels which either met or exceeded comparable analog coverage levels.

And (in spite of numerous concerns by the public and other broadcasters) Viola:

73.404 Interim Hybrid IBOC DAB Operation.
(a) The licensee of an AM or FM station, or the permittee of a new AM or FM station which has commenced program test operation pursuant to § 73.1620, may commence interim hybrid IBOC DAB operation with digital facilities which conform to the technical specifications specified for hybrid DAB operation in the First Report and Order in MM Docket No. 99-325, as revised in the Media Bureau’s subsequent Order in MM Docket No. 99-325. FM stations are permitted to operate with hybrid digital effective radiated power equal to one percent (-20 decibels below carrier (dBc)) of authorized analog effective radiated power and may operate with up to ten percent (-10 dBc) of authorized analog effective radiated power in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Media Bureau’s Order in MM Docket No 99-325. An AM or FM station may transmit IBOC signals during all hours for which the station is licensed to broadcast.

Notice how they stuck AM nighttime operation in there too.  Now I get to hear IBOC signals over riding adjacent channel stations that used to come in clearly via skywave.  One tends to wonder if this interference is not deliberate.  Crush the small operators with interference, make their stations worthless, drive them out of business…

To help things along, iBiquity has offered to reduce their licensing fees to $5,000.00  (oops, its more like $10,500 – 12,500). These rules were put into effect on January 29, 2010.  According to the FCC database, there are 1524 FM stations and 292 AM stations transmitting IBOC.  That breaks down to 15% of the FM stations and 6% of the AM stations.  I will post an update if there is a sudden rush to install IBOC. Still a pretty low penetration for a 10-20-year-old technology.  It is likely these low numbers are the reason why both broadcast bands are still mostly listenable, at least from a technical perspective.

As the noise floor rises and the competing stations sink further and further into the mud, the audience will turn to non-static-filled technologies to listen to their music and other programs.

Communications infrastructure vulnerability

I was speaking with a friend of mine recently about some interference issues he was having at an FM transmitter site.  There were several cellular and PCS tenants at this site and something from the FM transmitter was interfering with the GPS receivers.  This one very small glitch was causing multiple carriers to go offline, basically shutting down the entire wireless infrastructure at this particular site.

GPS signals are used for syncing carrier frequencies and modulation timing for CDMA and TDMA that all cellular, PSC, and 3G, 4G (or whatever G) wireless systems use to seamlessly hand off users from one site to another.  Without it, the entire system will shut down.

What would happen to communications in this country if all GPS were interrupted?  When I was in the military, we spoke often about high-altitude nuclear detonations and the possible effects they would have on our communications circuits.  In fact, we drilled for such things.  Often.  What, if anything, are wireless carriers doing to keep their sites online if, heaven forbid, somebody does something to disrupt GPS?  If terrestrial radio and television broadcasting is going to be replaced by 3G and 4G wireless networks, how redundant are they?  I know, for example, many cell sites do not have long-term backup power.  They have battery banks, which in a power outage, may last 6-10 hours, but after that, the site is down.

Further, how about vulnerabilities getting the data to and from these sites?  Most cell sites rely on some type of TELCO circuit, usually a T-1 (DS-1) or multiple T-1 to interface with the wired network.  This includes voice, text, and data services.  If those circuits are down, then anything connected to them will be offline.

What about redundant transmitters, antennas, receivers, etc?  How much of the current wireless infrastructure is backed up with spares?  It causes me worry to think that someday traditional broadcasters will be going out of business due to poor financial planning, leaving us all to subscription-based data services that may or may not be there in an emergency.  At least with many radio and TV stations, there are generators, backup transmitters, microwave systems, and so forth.  Most good broadcasters have emergency plans for the restoration of service during a disaster.  EAS may not be the greatest thing ever, but right now, it is the only emergency communications plan we have. Radio is still the best and most robust way to communicate vital information during emergencies.  Cell sites go offline along with whatever G wireless service, cable TV systems go offline due to power outages or damaged distribution networks, landline phones can be taken out due to power interruptions at the company office, or damaged networks.

Why do I care? Why should you care?  Because, as I have eluded in previous posts, with the demise of local newspapers, the demise of local radio, the erosion of local TV news coverage, and the general trivialization of our political apparatus on the local and national levels, we are losing our voice.  We will lose our democracy.  Right now, the US is on the verge of becoming an oligarchy or a corporatocracy.

What road are we traveling down when unrestricted free access to information is gone?  The internet is a great resource, but it is not free.  What will happen to the price of internet access when competing information and entertainment technologies such as radio, TV, and newspapers disappear?  Look to our transportation sector for an example.  Gone are the vast majority of passenger railroads that crisscrossed the country for nearly 100 years.  In many places, public transportation is laughable.  How do you get to work?  How do you get to the store?  How much will $5.00 per gallon of gas affect your life?  More importantly, what can you do about it when the cost of fuel gets expensive? Nothing.  Most people are stuck in their suburban homes with not even a convenience store within walking distance.

What will happen when terrestrial radio goes away?  I shudder to think.