{"id":7029,"date":"2013-07-17T08:15:04","date_gmt":"2013-07-17T12:15:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/?p=7029"},"modified":"2023-03-30T08:36:32","modified_gmt":"2023-03-30T12:36:32","slug":"the-curious-case-of-the-wkze-notice-of-violation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/2013\/07\/the-curious-case-of-the-wkze-notice-of-violation\/","title":{"rendered":"The curious case of the WKZE Notice Of Violation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>On June 19th, WKZE received a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/DOC-321765A1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">notice of violation<\/a> from the FCC&#8217;s New York Field office.&nbsp; The crux of the issue seems to be interference being generated on 784.8 MHz (WKZE 8th harmonic) to a new Verizon Wireless installation located nearby:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>47 C.F.R. \u00a773.317(a): \u201cFM broadcast stations employing transmitters authorized after January 1, 1960, must maintain the bandwidth occupied by their emissions in accordance with the specification detailed below. FM broadcast stations employing transmitters installed or type accepted before January 1, 1960, must achieve the highest degree of compliance with these specifications practicable with their existing equipment. In either case, should harmful interference to other authorized stations occur, the licensee shall correct the problem promptly or cease operation.\u201d The eighth harmonic of Station WKZE-FM (784.8 MHz) was causing interference to the Verizon Wireless transmitter located approximately 500 feet away.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>First off, we note that the WKZE transmitter is not allegedly causing interference to a Verizon Wireless transmitter, but rather to a Verizon Wireless receiver.&nbsp; That may be splitting hairs, however, since the FCC is quoting a technical rules violation, they can at least get the technical language right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A brief examination of the rest of FCC part 73.317 is in order to find the specification cited in section (a).\u00a0 Section (d) states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>&nbsp;(d) Any emission appearing on a frequency removed from the carrier by more than 600 kHz must be attenuated at least 43 + 10 Log10 (Power, in watts) dB below the level of the unmodulated carrier, or 80 dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Since 784.8 MHz &#8211; 98.1 MHz is greater than 600 KHz, this is the section that applies to the WKZE situation.\u00a0 Thus, the interfering signal must be greater than -80 dBc to trigger the Notice Of Violation (NOV) from the FCC.\u00a0 The station ERP is 1,800 watts or +62 dBm.\u00a0 Measurements were made with an Agilent N992A spectrum analyzer using an LPA-1000 log periodic antenna.\u00a0 At a 12-foot distance away from the WKZE transmitter cabinet, the signal on 784.8 MHz was found to be -94 dBc or 0.000063 watts.\u00a0 At the base of the Verizon Wireless tower, the measurement was -124 dBc, or 0.000000025 watt, which is barely perceptible above the -130 dBm noise floor.\u00a0 There does not appear to be any violation of 47 CFR 73.317.\u00a0 Rather, the issue seems to be Verizon Wireless&#8217;s deployment of the 700 MHz LTE band and the use of high-gain antennas coupled with high-gain preamplifiers on frequencies that are harmonically related to broadcast stations nearby.\u00a0 In this particular installation, the antenna has 16 dB of gain, minus a 4.5 dB of transmission line loss into a 21 dB preamplifier before the receiver.\u00a0 At the output of the Verizon preamplifier, the signal on 784.8 MHz was measured at -89 dBc, which is <em>still in compliance<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By these measurements, clearly, WKZE is not in violation of any FCC regulation.\u00a0 It makes one wonder, does the FCC understand its own rules?\u00a0 Or, is this a matter of favoritism towards a huge corporation over a small independent radio broadcaster?\u00a0 Is it a matter of &#8220;broadband at the expense of all others?&#8221;\u00a0 There are several of these broadcast to 700 MHZ LTE interference cases pending throughout the country.\u00a0 This could set a dangerous precedent for broadcasters and other RF spectrum users as wireless giants like Verizon throw their weight around and eye even more spectrum to press into broadband service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commlaw blog has a good post on this subject: <a rel=\"noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/www.commlawblog.com\/2013\/06\/articles\/broadcast\/harmonic-convergence-fm-interference-to-700-mhz-lte-service\/\" target=\"_blank\">Harmonic Convergence?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Update: The response from the WKZE attorney can be found here, including the above-mentioned actual measurements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On June 19th, WKZE received a notice of violation from the FCC&#8217;s New York Field office.&nbsp; The crux of the issue seems to be interference being generated on 784.8 MHz (WKZE 8th harmonic) to a new Verizon Wireless installation located nearby: 47 C.F.R. \u00a773.317(a): \u201cFM broadcast stations employing transmitters authorized after January 1, 1960, must &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/2013\/07\/the-curious-case-of-the-wkze-notice-of-violation\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The curious case of the WKZE Notice Of Violation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[274,300,42,82,15,275],"class_list":["post-7029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tech-stuff","tag-broadband","tag-fcc","tag-fcc-enforcement","tag-fm","tag-fm-transmitters","tag-lte"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7029"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11360,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7029\/revisions\/11360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}