When I was a young lad, still impressionable I might add, I would listen to the big AM powerhouses at night with my little transistor radio. \u00a0I have eluded to this in previous posts. \u00a0I have also written an article for Radio World in which I suggest turning AM transmitter off at overnight hours to save money, with certain caveats. \u00a0I still listen to AM radio quite often. \u00a0I have a Kenwood R-2000 MF\/HF receiver which, while not the best technical receiver, is the best-sounding AM receiver I have ever heard. \u00a0Its wide AM IF bandwidth is 6.5 kHz, which seems to work very well with the high-end pre-emphasis curves most good AM processors employ. \u00a0Music, especially oldies, which were recorded in AM’s hay day sounds spectacular. \u00a0There is no other AM radio that sounds as good as this unit. \u00a0 Right now, the sun has just set and I am listening to WFED 1500 KHz in Washington DC. \u00a0 \u00a0They are airing a VOA program called “Issues in the News.” \u00a0It’s real red-meat radio. \u00a0We are 250 air miles from the transmitter site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I think there is a place for AM stations, not just merely being satellite repeaters, but making a meaningful contribution to their communities of license. \u00a0Unfortunately, I am one of the few that thinks so. \u00a0For as long as I have been in radio, AM has been declining. \u00a0It is a matter of economics, most GMs would tell me. \u00a0That being said, the two three-letter call signs that I worked at were consistently in the top four in the rating book. \u00a0Clearly, live local programming was the key to this success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The notion that they sound bad may or may not be true. \u00a0An AM station that has a properly tuned and matched antenna can sound very good. \u00a0Using a good receiver, one that has good fidelity, good selection and sensitivity can also increase listening pleasure. \u00a0Unfortunately, almost all AM radios being sold today have an IF bandwidth that is only slightly better than a telephone around 2-3 kHz. \u00a0This is because… I don’t know. \u00a0Originally receiver manufacturers began limiting bandwidth to reduce interference. \u00a0NRSC-2 was supposed to limit interference by reducing out-of-bandwidth splatter. \u00a0Apparently, the manufacturers didn’t get the word.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Who knows, as the FM band gets filled with shit (interference from adjacent channel IBOC, translators shoehorned in, LPFM’s on third adjacent channels) AM radio might be viable again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Once the moneymen got a hold of the broadcasting industry, everything was geared toward making money. \u00a0Not that making money is wrong, it is certainly good to make a profit, however, with the margins on the FM stations, usually between 25-50%, AM stations were relegated to second place because their margins were much less than that. \u00a0 Even so, many AM stations were initially profitable during the consolidation and still had some ratings. \u00a0Not so anymore. \u00a0AM stations also require more maintenance, because of directional antennas and all that is associated with those systems. \u00a0What a banker or an accountant sees when he looks at an AM radio station is a money pit. \u00a0And, if the station has been run into the ground, it is a money pit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Still, a small AM at a fire sale price might be fun to rehab. \u00a0Launch some type of community radio format, put AM radio back where it was 30 years ago, solidly in the community. \u00a0It might be fun.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When I was a young lad, still impressionable I might add, I would listen to the big AM powerhouses at night with my little transistor radio. \u00a0I have eluded to this in previous posts. \u00a0I have also written an article for Radio World in which I suggest turning AM transmitter off at overnight hours to … Continue reading AM radio<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[87],"class_list":["post-621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-am"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=621"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11823,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621\/revisions\/11823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}