{"id":5592,"date":"2012-10-03T08:00:44","date_gmt":"2012-10-03T12:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/?p=5592"},"modified":"2012-10-02T19:03:52","modified_gmt":"2012-10-02T23:03:52","slug":"am-radio-improvement-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/2012\/10\/am-radio-improvement-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"AM Radio Improvement Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There has been lots of hand wringing and ink spilled regarding the sorry state of affairs in the senior service. AM is plagued with problems; interference, poor bandwidth, etc. To that end, the NAB has launched studies and initiatives and hired all sorts of pricey consultants to consult with. Here is my own AM improvement plan and it is rather simple:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Clean up the transmitter site.<\/li>\n<li>Get rid of AM HD radio.<\/li>\n<li>Variable IF bandwidth receivers.<\/li>\n<li>Improve Programming.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>How many of us have seen AM transmitter site dumps? Deferred maintenance, malfunctioning directional arrays, trees growing up on the ground system, flooded buildings and ATU&#8217;s,\u00a0 rusty towers, transmitters not a full power, ground system deteriorated or missing all together, just to list a few problems.\u00a0 Many AM transmitter sites are technical disasters.\u00a0 Think that these things have no bearing on the AM station&#8217;s signal?\u00a0 Think again.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5622\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5622\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5622\" title=\"AM-tower\" src=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower-650x388.jpg\" alt=\"differed maintenance, AM transmitter site\" width=\"650\" height=\"388\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower-650x388.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower-150x89.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower-300x179.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower-400x239.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/AM-tower.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5622\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Differed maintenance, AM transmitter site (there is a tower in there somewhere)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Trees growing around the tower base can attenuate the signal by 30%.\u00a0 A comment from a well known engineering firm:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;Recently XXX field engineers had occasion to measure an AM station at XXXX kHz before and after removing vegetation in the vicinity. The station had a quarter-wave tower. The base area had grown up in brush and hardwood trees to a height of perhaps 30 feet (9m) and this extended from near the base across the entire ground system. After clearing (cutting, no ground system disturbance), the signal measured at some 16 locations on four radials went up a uniform amount of about 15% or 1.2 DB. That&#8217;s about a 30% increase in radiated power&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That is an inexpensive power boost and they didn&#8217;t even have to file with the FCC! A 1 &#8211; 2 dB power gain is pretty nice and can mean the difference between a listenable signal and static.\u00a0 How many times have I heard the lament that AM band is full of noise and not listenable.\u00a0 Certainly, there are major challenges in the urban listening environment.\u00a0 Putting forth a better signal will overcome some of this electrical noise.<\/p>\n<p>There is a reason why engineering standards were developed for the physical plant; they work.<\/p>\n<p>There is no cure for the noise that AM HD Radio puts out into the adjacent channels.\u00a0 This self interference benefits none, not even the station transmitting AM HD Radio.\u00a0 This dubious technology has proved itself a non-starter and should be discontinued.\u00a0 For smaller station owners, the cost of implementing AM HD Radio is prohibitive.\u00a0 Licensing of a proprietary modulation scheme, new transmitting equipment, specialized exciters plus any needed bandwidth improvements to AM antenna arrays can easily exceed $100,000.00.\u00a0 Unfortunately, it is often the small AM radio operators that are making a good showing, and serving their community of license and making money.\u00a0 These are the very stations that are hurt the most by adjacent channel AM HD Radio interference.<\/p>\n<p>Receiver design over the last twenty to thirty years has been the greater issue with perceived low AM broadcast quality.\u00a0 AM receivers have an average bandwidth of just 3-4 KHz, which is slightly better than telephone quality.\u00a0 AM broadcasting has gotten a bad wrap because of this and there are many comments about how AM is &#8220;inferior quality&#8221; to FM.\u00a0 With a quality older receiver, AM can sound very good.\u00a0 Of course, the receiver manufactures all point adjacent channel interference as their rational for reducing IF bandwidth.\u00a0 Why not leave it in the hands of the user? The GE Superradio had this feature with a &#8220;wide&#8221; and &#8220;narrow&#8221; setting for AM reception.\u00a0 They worked remarkably well. \u00a0 A receiver could also be designed to automatically increase IF bandwidth at higher received signal strengths.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, as the saying goes; Garbage in, Garbage out (GIGO).\u00a0 This holds true for many things including radio programming.\u00a0 Expecting that mediocre satellite syndicated news talk will garner great ratings and huge revenues is silly.\u00a0 For years and years, station owners have put minimal effort into AM radio and expected big returns.\u00a0 It is not working.\u00a0 AM stations that go against that trend; those with unique formats (Gasp! Music, on AM?), local content, and community oriented programming can and do succeed.\u00a0 They are fighting an up hill battle in both directions.\u00a0 With all of the business pressures from larger broadcast groups, interference issues and negative viewpoint on the viability of the AM band, one wonders how long they can last.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There has been lots of hand wringing and ink spilled regarding the sorry state of affairs in the senior service. AM is plagued with problems; interference, poor bandwidth, etc. To that end, the NAB has launched studies and initiatives and hired all sorts of pricey consultants to consult with. Here is my own AM improvement &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/2012\/10\/am-radio-improvement-plan\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">AM Radio Improvement Plan<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,4],"tags":[87,18,303],"class_list":["post-5592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hd-radio","category-tech-stuff","tag-am","tag-am-transmitter-site","tag-hd-radio"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5592"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5629,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5592\/revisions\/5629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}