Old world and all that. \u00a0I am of the impression that European broadcast engineers are a more studied lot. \u00a0Their process involves much more deliberation, thoughtful analysis, and planning than ours does. \u00a0For example, when it comes to station loudness, most programmers and many engineers (myself not included) to do more is better. \u00a0It is thus that we get the Omina 11 and other audio squashers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The EBU technical group<\/a> takes a different approach:<\/p>\n\n\n\n EBU R128<\/a> (ed: Loudness Recommendation) is the result of two years of intense work by the audio experts in the EBU PLOUD Group<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Aside from the above-mentioned EBU R128, there are four technical papers dealing with implementation, meters, distribution, and so on. \u00a0The body of work is a recommendation, not a requirement. \u00a0I can’t imagine the voluntary implementation of something like this in the US. \u00a0Even so, there are advantages to having a single acceptable level of programming audio. \u00a0It is interesting reading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Old world and all that. \u00a0I am of the impression that European broadcast engineers are a more studied lot. \u00a0Their process involves much more deliberation, thoughtful analysis, and planning than ours does. \u00a0For example, when it comes to station loudness, most programmers and many engineers (myself not included) to do more is better. \u00a0It is … Continue reading They do it a little differently in Europe<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[102],"tags":[306,123],"class_list":["post-2927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-audio","tag-audio","tag-processing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2927"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11808,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2927\/revisions\/11808"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.engineeringradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n