GPS Jamming devices: FCC says No!

The FCC has become concerned about Jamming devices for Cellphones, GPS and WiFi.  So much so, they have released Enforcement Advisory No. 2012-02, which specifies fines in excess of $100,000 per incident.

The advisory states:

In recent days, there have been various press reports about commuters using cell phone jammers to create a “quiet zone” on buses or trains. We caution consumers that it is against the law to use a cell or GPS jammer or any other type of device that blocks, jams or interferes with authorized communications, as well as to import, advertise, sell, or ship such a device. The FCC Enforcement Bureau has a zero tolerance policy in this area and will take aggressive action against violators.

I have two three thoughts:

  1. GPS jammers are increasingly being employed by those who are concerned about their privacy.  That set of people can range from truckers who don’t what their bosses to know every aspect of their journey, citizens concerned about GPS tracking devices on their vehicles, or ordinary people who don’t want the phone company tracking their every move via GPS enabled cellphones.
  2. If only the FCC were as diligent and judicious in pursuit of other interference issues in the radio frequency spectrum.  A few that immediately spring to mind; IBOC to analog adjacent channels, broadband over power line, electrical noise on the medium wave band, illegal 2 way radios on RPU frequencies, etc.  Of course, there is no money in those issues.
  3. Wasn’t the FCC about to allow Lightsquared to install high powered 4G data transmitters all over the place, thus jamming GPS anyway?  I know they nixed that plan after the general uproar over loss of GPS by things like aircraft in flight, etc.

It remains to be seen how, exactly the FCC is going to find things like this:

Small GPS jammer
Small GPS jammer

Hypothetically speaking, in a mobile operating environment while traveling down the interstate at 70 MPH with thousands of other vehicles, it would be the proverbial search for a needle in a haystack.  This would be especially true for a GPS only jamming device, which would require a very small amount of power to jam the weak satellite signals.  It presents an interesting problem for the cash strapped enforcement bureau.

Not all jamming devices are this small, however.  After doing a Google search for GPS jamming devices I notice that some of them are great big honking things, with heatsinks and fans, capable of generating large signals on every cellphone, WiFi, 3/4G and GPS frequency.   Those larger jamming devices would be very easy to locate and disable.

Perhaps if the technology wasn’t so pervasive and readily abused by certain corporate and government entities, the desire to jam it wouldn’t exist.

Which do you prefer, GPS or 4G data?

Block II GPS satellite
Block II GPS satellite

In some locations, it is apparently going to be an either or situation if this is to be believed:

Representatives of the GPS industry presented to members of the Federal Communications Commission clear, strong laboratory evidence of interference with the GPS signal by a proposed new broadcaster on January 19 of this year. The teleconference and subsequent written results of the testing apparently did not dissuade FCC International Bureau Chief Mindel De La Torre from authorizing Lightsquared to proceed with ancillary terrestrial component operations, installing up to 40,000 high-power transmitters close to the GPS frequency, across the United States.

Sound vaguely familiar?  Seems that LightSquared took a page from the iBiquity play book when it comes to dealing with the FCC.   The article goes on to say:

On January 26, the FCC waived its own rules (emphasis mine) and granted permission for the potential interferer to broadcast in the L Band 1 (1525 MHz—1559 MHz) from powerful land-based transmitters.

A little research on the LightSquared website shows they are rolling out an extensive L band 4G data network, not exactly what I would call broadcasting, at least not yet anyway.  GPS system inhabits 1559 – 1610 MHz, centered around 1575.42 Mhz  in the L-band.  The signals coming from GPS satellites are very, very low, with the open sky signal around -130 to -135 dBm.  Indoor signals can be as low as -150 dBm.  Further, GPS receivers currently in the field were not built to operate in environments with high levels of RF energy on nearby frequencies.

So, who uses GPS?  Just about everybody, including the military, the aviation industry, broadcasters, and general public.  Think about all the confused drivers who can no longer find their way to the grocery store without Tom-Tom.  By far, the biggest impact is likely to be the entire cell phone network, which depends on GPS for it’s multiplex timing.  It seems very likely that LightSquared network will be installed on existing broadcast and cell towers, right on top of the current cellular tenants.  Even if they work around this by providing better GPS receivers with high pass filters,  many existing consumer and aviation GPS receivers will be useless.

The potential interference is charted here:

Interference to consumer grade GPS receivers
Interference to consumer grade GPS receivers

For FAA certified GPS receivers, the data is worse:

Interference to FAA certified GPS receivers
Interference to FAA certified GPS receivers

The FAA certified aviation receivers are more sensitive, therefore, more likely to be impacted.

It makes me wonder, what is going on in Washington?

UPDATE: March 3, 2011, KNX, Los Angles runs with the story: Planned 4G service could cause widespread GPS jamming