<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Engineering Radio &#187; programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/category/programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog</link>
	<description>When I was 10, I caught the radio bug, it appears to be terminal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More news talk migrates to the FM band</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/09/more-news-talk-migrates-to-the-fm-band/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/09/more-news-talk-migrates-to-the-fm-band/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once a bastion of the AM dial, News and or News/Talk format radio stations seem to be springing up on the FM band more and more often.  The original premise for creating talk radio on the AM band was the lower bandwidth and reduced (or perception of reduced) fidelity when compared to the FM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a bastion of the AM dial, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-news_radio" target="_blank">News</a> and or News/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_radio" target="_blank">Talk</a> format radio stations seem to be springing up on the FM band more and more often.  The original premise for creating talk radio on the AM band was the lower bandwidth and reduced (or perception of reduced) fidelity when compared to the FM band lent itself to non-music programming.  The reality is that receiver manufactures never carried through on the NRSC-2 technical improvements, and AM receivers reproduced thin, low quality audio.  I digress, the story goes, the FM band was great for music and the AM band did well with information and talk.</p>
<p>Of course, there were always a few exceptions to those general rules, but for the most part, that pattern held true until about 2009 or 10.  That is when AM station&#8217;s programming began to be simulcast again (everything old is new again) on FM stations and HD-2 subchannels.   It would be interesting to examine why this is so and what it means to the radio business as a whole.</p>
<p>The general trend in the music industry has also been down.  This is important because record labels and the radio business used to go hand in hand.  Record labels had the job of separating the wheat from the chaff.  Those groups or artist that had the talent would be given recording contracts and airplay.  With exposure, they would become more known, sell more recordings, record more songs, etc until they peaked and began to decline.  Radio stations prospered under this arrangement because they took on none of the risk while getting huge vast quantities of program material to playback, and charge advertising fees for spaces within that programming.</p>
<p>So far so good.</p>
<p>Then, two things happened:</p>
<ol>
<li>The communications act of 1996</li>
<li>The internet</li>
</ol>
<p>The communications act of 1996 forever changed the way the radio business was run in this country.  No longer were there several thousand individual stations, the most influential of which resided in markets #1 and #2.  Instead there were conglomerations of stations run out of Atlanta, Fort Worth and a dozen or so other medium sized cities.  No longer were stations competing head to head and trying to be the best and serve their respective audiences; rather, station A was positioned against station B to erode some of it&#8217;s audience so that station C could get better national buys from big ad agencies.  No longer would possible controversial artists like the Indigo Girls get airplay on some groups.  Songs were sanitized against possible FCC indecency sanctions, morning shows became bland and safe, and radio on the whole became a lot less edgy as big corporate attorneys put the clamps on anything that would invite unwanted exposure.</p>
<p>The last great musical genre was the Grunge/Seattle Sound of the early 1990&#8242;s.  Those bands somehow mixed heavy metal, obscure mumbled lyrics, flannel shirts and ripped jeans into something that the dissatisfied Gen Xers could understand and appreciate.  By 1996, this had morphed into &#8220;Modern Rock,&#8221; and carried on for several years after that, to fade out in the early 00&#8242;s.  Since that time, there has been no great musical innovations, at least on the creative side, other than the ubiquitous Apple computer and Pro Sound Tools software.</p>
<p>The internet greatly changed the way recording labels did business, mainly by eating into their bottom line.  This had the effect of circling the wagons and throwing up a protective barrier against almost all innovation.  The net result was fewer and fewer talented artists being able to record, which pushed those people into smaller, sometimes home based recording studios.  While those studios can put out good or sometimes even excellent material, often the recordings lack the professional touches that a highly trained recording engineer can add.  Add to this the mass input of the internet and no longer are bands or artists pre-screened.  Some may point to that as a good development with more variety available for the average person.  Perhaps, but the average person does not have time to go through and find good music to download from the iTunes store.  Thus, a break developed in the method of getting good, talented artists needed exposure.  Youtube has become one of the places to find new music, but it is still a chore to wade through all the selections.</p>
<p>Thus, when FM HD-2 channels came into being, there was little new programming to be put into play.  HD radio was left to broadcast existing material with reduced coverage and quality than that of analog FM.  That trend continues today where now analog FM channels are being used to broadcast the news/talk programming that used to reign on AM.</p>
<p>What will happen next?  If Tim Westergren has any say, the internet (namely Pandora) will take over and terrestrial radio will cease to exist.  Current trends point solidly in that direction, although I think Tim is a little ahead himself in his prediction.</p>
<p>News/Talk on the FM dial point not to an attempt to shift the wheezing, white, (C)onservative/(R)epublican programming to a younger demographic, who will, if I am any judge of history, remain unimpressed.  No, rather, they are running out of other source material, simulcasting syndicated talk radio is cheap, lean and a good way to make money without having to pay actual salaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/09/more-news-talk-migrates-to-the-fm-band/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison: Over the air listening on FM vs. streaming audio on Android phone</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/06/comparison-over-the-air-listening-on-fm-vs-streaming-audio-on-android-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/06/comparison-over-the-air-listening-on-fm-vs-streaming-audio-on-android-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have had my HTC Android phone for just about a year now, which is enough time to learn the device&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses.  I have done a fair amount of listening to audio, watching youtube videos and playing .mp3&#8242;s to give me some idea of the technical quality and operational issues.  Like anything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had my HTC Android phone for just about a year now, which is enough time to learn the device&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses.  I have done a fair amount of listening to audio, watching youtube videos and playing .mp3&#8242;s to give me some idea of the technical quality and operational issues.  Like anything else, these are general observations.  Some radio station&#8217;s streams sound better than other due to the effort those stations put into audio quality.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/TuneIn-Radio-Logo.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3000" title="TuneIn-Radio-Logo" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/TuneIn-Radio-Logo-300x84.png" alt="" width="300" height="84" /></a>The listening test was done with a set of Sony earbuds, which sound far better than the small speaker built into the phone.  For ease in streaming audio, I used the <a href="http://tunein.com/" target="_blank">TuneIn Radio</a> application for Android by TuneIn Inc.  For this test, I only listened to FM broadcast stations, both streaming and over the air.</p>
<p>The over the air tuner is the stock factory radio in my 1997 Jeep Cherokee.  I would rate the radio average in every way.  The actual tests were done driving around on interstate highways and other major roadways.  There were a few instances where I had to give up on the Android phone due to traffic and driving considerations.</p>
<p>My Android phone has an FM tuner installed in it, however, it is really useless.  I get only local stations, and then their audio is all hissy and for the most part unlistenable.  The HTC FM tuner uses the headphone wire for an antenna, which may be a part of the problem.</p>
<p>Here is a chart of my observations:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Category evaluated</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Analog FM radio</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Streaming via Android</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Overall Station Selection</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Only those stations that can be received</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Any station that is listed in TuneIn Radio App*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Varity of interesting programming</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Only those receivable signals which limits it to a few   well programmed stations, the rest being garbage</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Almost unlimited, world wide*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Available formats</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Only those stations that can be received</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Any station that is listed in TuneIn Radio App*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Ease of use</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Can press the preset or scan buttons on radio without   taking eyes off the road*</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Requires squinting at a small screen and pressing several   little boxes to get to the desired station</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Annoying commercial avoidance</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">See above on preset and scan buttons*</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Very difficult to change stations quickly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Quality of sound</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Good to excellent, depending on the station’s signal   strength*</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Fair to good, depending on the bit rate and network   congestion, some stations sound very good and some can sound very bad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Drop outs</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Occasional picket fencing with distant stations,   otherwise, non-existent*</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Varies depending on location, can be quite annoying,   especially in mobile environment.  App   also occasionally locks up and needs to be restarted</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Expense</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Free, radio came with the vehicle, no paid data service needed*</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Requires data plan with smart phone, some plans cap data   amounts, can be fairly expensive</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="197" valign="top">Overall enjoyment</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Good</td>
<td width="197" valign="top">Good</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*Wins category.</p>
<p>I am having a difficult time assigning the overall enjoyment as well as an over all winner.  One the one hand, it was very cool, driving down I-84 in Danbury, CT listening to Howlin&#8217; Wolf on New Orleans&#8217; non-commercial Jazz station, <a href="http://www.wwoz.org/" target="_blank"> WWOZ</a>.  On the other hand, it was a right pain in the ass to get to that point, in rush hour traffic.  By the way WWOZ&#8217;s web stream is excellent, audio wise.</p>
<p>From a safety and ease of use, the FM radio in the Jeep wins hands down, I just don&#8217;t know how many more times I can listen to the same Led Zeppelin song on <a href="http://www.i95rock.com/" target="_blank">i95</a> (that used to be I-95, frankly I thought Steve Jobs copyrighted the lower case i).</p>
<p>The drop outs were also a concern, mostly taking place in on the section of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_84_(east)" target="_blank">I-84</a> going through Putnam County, NY.  I don&#8217;t know if my cell carrier needs to beef up it&#8217;s data coverage in that area, or if there were just a great many users on the network checking their e-mail, etc.</p>
<p>If they could sort out the ease of operation problem and get rid of the drop outs, streaming audio over HTC Android would win hands down.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/06/comparison-over-the-air-listening-on-fm-vs-streaming-audio-on-android-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TuneIn Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/03/tunein-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/03/tunein-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I posted previously about how to listen to radio station streams on an Android phone. In the time between then and now, somebody has come up with a much better way to do it.  TuneIn Radio is both a website for streaming and a mobile application for Android and iPhone users alike.</p> <p>I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/TuneIn-Radio-Logo-White.png"><img src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/TuneIn-Radio-Logo-White-300x84.png" alt="" title="TuneIn-Radio-Logo-White" width="300" height="84" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2723" /></a>I posted previously about how to listen to radio station streams on an Android phone. In the time between then and now, somebody has come up with a much better way to do it.  <a href="http://tunein.com/mobile/" target="_blank">TuneIn Radio</a> is both a website for streaming and a mobile application for Android and iPhone users alike.</p>
<p>I have found that every local radio station that has a web stream is listed.  The major overseas broadcasters like the BBC, CBC, Radio Netherlands, and so on as well as all of the non-government US owned shortwave stations are listed.  As their website states:</p>
<blockquote><p>With over 30,000 FM and AM radio stations from across the globe, TuneIn Radio makes radio local, no matter how far from home you might be.</p></blockquote>
<p>Far easier than what I posted before.  Further, this is exactly the type of service that terrestrial broadcasters needed the most; a concise consolidated listing broken down by genre and locality, to compete with Pandora, Slacker, Last.fm,  et. al.</p>
<p>In order to download TuneIn Radio, point your mobile web browser to http://tunein.com and it will automatically direct you to the proper download source.  Or one could search through the Apple store or Android Market to find the app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2011/03/tunein-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio Industry Technology Study</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/11/radio-industry-technology-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/11/radio-industry-technology-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wheatstone, Inc has sponsored a radio industry future technology study which brings into focus some of the connections between technology and radio business models.   It appears to be very thorough, polling radio professionals on all aspects of technology development and management.</p> <p>According to Josh Gordon:</p> <p>While it is hard to predict which of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wheatstone-corp.com/" target="_blank">Wheatstone, Inc</a> has sponsored a radio industry future technology study which brings into focus some of the connections between technology and radio business models.   It appears to be very thorough, polling radio professionals on all aspects of technology development and management.</p>
<p>According to Josh Gordon:</p>
<blockquote><p>While it is hard to predict which of the radio industry’s newest business models will succeed in generating new revenues, we can better anticipate the winners by measuring how fast the technologies that enable them are being adopted.</p>
<p>To find out, we surveyed the radio professionals involved in all aspects of technology management (engineers, and operations and technical management). The results reported in this study can serve as a benchmark for managers to evaluate their own organizations’ progress.</p></blockquote>
<p>The first graph is telling:</p>
<div id="attachment_1902" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 660px"><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tech-survey-results.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1902" title="tech survey results" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tech-survey-results.jpg" alt="Wheatstone Technology Survey Results" width="650" height="445" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wheatstone Technology Survey Results</p></div>
<p>Almost everyone believes that the internet will play a greater role in radio (and all media).  This goes against the &#8220;radio with its head in the sand&#8221; idea that can be found in some corners of the internet (I&#8217;d provide a link, but the site has turned on a paywall).</p>
<p>The question is, what are management type people doing about it.  Some have good ideas on how to bridge the gap between making money the old fashioned way; selling spots, to making money the new way; brand imaging,  media promotion and personal contact through new media.  While it is generally agreed that radio stations should stream their audio, many, if not most, make little or no money on this.  If radio is going to make some revenue on internet applications, obviously some new ideas are needed.</p>
<p>Unique local content seems to be the most sought after, things like local news podcasts, or new music, e.g. studio sessions with up and coming band and musicians, locally produced shows that are area specific, etc. Put a 10 second sponsorship in front of those and people will get the message.  Other things like value added contests that can only be heard on the internet.  Interactive radio station apps that have streaming, now playing, recently heard features that link to a .mp3 store for iPhone and Android operating systems.  Text link adds on radio station web pages, etc.</p>
<p>On the flip side of this, huge, great amounts of bandwidth will be required if the internet streaming is going approach the same number of off the air listeners.  Depending on the how the radio station has the stream set up, anywhere from 20 to 64 kbps of data transfer is needed for each listener.  For a station in a large metropolitan area, multiply that by 500,000 to 4,000,000 listeners at any one time and data gridlock ensues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/wheatstone-E-6.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1904" title="wheatstone E-6" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/wheatstone-E-6.jpg" alt="" width="222" height="150" /></a>On the in house side, the red hot, cutting edge thing these days is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_over_IP" target="_blank">AOIP</a> (Audio over IP), which Wheatstone is heavily invested in with its E console series.  While some might not think of AOIP as a traditional internet application, it none the less uses the same transport protocols as other internet applications.   AOIP offers some great advantages over other routing systems, as both private (internal) and public (wide area) networking can be used to transfer audio in real time.  Of course, this is not as easy as plugging the new computer into an ethernet jack, it takes more planning than that.</p>
<p>Wheatstone has published an excellent white paper on <a href="http://www.wheatstone-radio.com/features/network-infrastructure.html" target="_blank">Network Design for Ethernet Audio</a>.  Well worth the read.</p>
<p>As AOIP technology develops more, web streams could come directly from the console and be customizable according to destination.  Further, IP logging can create stream user profiles and customizable greetings, listening preferences and so on.  This would require that the web streaming server be in house and the studio facility have enough bandwidth to handle all of the outgoing streams and other content.</p>
<p>Certainly an in house IT/Web developer will be needed to manage and maintain such a system.</p>
<p>You can download and read the entire studio at <a href="http://wheatstone-radio.com/avalanche/aletheawheatstone-radio-study.html" target="_blank">Alethea/Wheatstone Radio Survey</a>.  The cliff notes summary is this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finding #1: Almost all radio tech people believe the Internet will play a bigger part in the future of radio.</p>
<p>Finding #2:Of the new revenue generating technologies, streaming a station’s signal has the biggest earning potential.</p>
<p>Finding #3: Technologies that require little or no capital investment are being deployed at similar frequencies by both stand-alone and group owned stations.</p>
<p>Finding #4: A technology gap is emerging as stand-alone stations deploy revenue generating technologies requiring investment at only half the frequency as group owned stations.</p>
<p>Finding #5: The revenue generating technology that most group owned stations plan on deploying next is a mobile app, while for stand-alone stations, it is broadcasting in HD Radio, with mobile apps coming in a close second.</p>
<p>Finding #6: There is a big divide between radio stations that are now, or will soon be, making money from streaming their signal over the Internet, and those who likely never will.</p>
<p>Finding #7: The day will come slowly, but in 15 years a majority of radio stations expect they will have more online listeners than RF listeners.</p>
<p>Finding #8: Despite the expected decline in over the air listeners, few stations expect to turn off their transmitters.</p>
<p>Finding #9: Three years from now, radio station technology will be more IT centric with more automation, as well as more networking between stations, IT networks, and office and audio networks.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Finding #10: Three years from now, the stability of each radio station network will be more important, as will networks with no single point of failure.</p>
<p>Finding #11: Three years from now, more audio consoles will be networked together. Also, the bandwidth of those networks will be required to increase.</p>
<p>Finding #12: The top reason group owned stations bought an AoIP network was to reduce maintenance costs. The top reason for stand-alone stations: to share talent.</p>
<p>Finding #13: At stations that have installed an AoIP network, more than a third of stand-alone stations found installing it harder than anticipated, while only 16.7% of group owned stations found installation harder than anticipated.</p>
<p>Finding #14: At stations with an AoIP network, more than one in four stand-alone stations and one in three group owned stations report latency problems.</p></blockquote>
<p>The study is a good indication of where technical managers see growth.  One thing that internet sites like Pandora have shown, radio broadcasters cannot sit back and be content with the status quo.  Without technical innovation and some outside of the lines thinking, radio will be bypassed by newer more interactive media services.</p>
<p>Something to ponder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/11/radio-industry-technology-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vintage Texar Audio Prisms</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/09/vintage-texar-audio-prisms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/09/vintage-texar-audio-prisms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I give to you, the original Texar Audio Prism:</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Texar Audio Prism</p> <p>I love the sound of these units when coupled with an Optomod 8100A.  Many people have (or rather, had) difficulty setting these things up.  I found them to be very easy to deal with, just follow the instruction manual.  If that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give to you, the original Texar Audio Prism:</p>
<div id="attachment_1523" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 660px"><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/texar-audio-prism.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1523" title="texar audio prism" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/texar-audio-prism.jpg" alt="Texar Audio Prism" width="650" height="389" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Texar Audio Prism</p></div>
<p>I love the sound of these units when coupled with an Optomod 8100A.  Many people have (or rather, had) difficulty setting these things up.  I found them to be very easy to deal with, just follow the instruction manual.  If that doesn&#8217;t sound good, then there is something wrong with the unit.  Over the years, there are only a few consistent problems.  The first thing is with the voltage regulators.  They have heat sinks attached with nylon screws.  The screws get brittle and fall apart, making the regulator overheat and go bad.  I have taken to replacing the nylon screws, and if the heat sink has fallen off, the entire regulator.  There are also a few electrolytic capacitors in the power supply and on the audio board, it is always a good practice to replace those.  Otherwise, unless the unit has been blown up by lightning, it should work.</p>
<p>As for set up, follow the directions in the manual:</p>
<ol>
<li>Bypass the units using bypass switch</li>
<li>Turn on onboard pink noise generator</li>
<li>Using the test ports on the front of the unit, plug a Simpson 260 VOM set on 2.5 VAC  important: use the ground port on the front of unit, not the case</li>
<li>For use with an Optomod 8100A, using the dB scale on the Simpson 260, set all the bands for a 4.0 reading.  Set the density to 3/4.</li>
<li>Turn off pink noise generator and switch out of bypass mode.</li>
<li>Make sure the levels in the studio are where they should be.</li>
<li>Adjust the input gain so the &#8220;Buffer Active&#8221; light does not come on during normal level programming.</li>
<li>Adjust the output levels so that the input buffer on the Optomod reads between -7 and -3 vu.</li>
</ol>
<p>The rest of the settings are on the Optomod:</p>
<ol>
<li>Clipping = 0</li>
<li>HF limiting = 5</li>
<li>Release time = 2</li>
<li>Bass coupling = 2</li>
<li>Gate = 0</li>
<li>Set the input attenuators for about 10 dB total gain reduction, with peaks around 15 dB or so.</li>
</ol>
<p>Then set the L-R null.  To do this, make sure the program material is in mono, then adjust the L or R input attenuator for minimum reading.  Also, if the Audio Prism has PR-1 (phase rotators) installed, bypass the phase rotator in the Optomod.  There is also a replacement card 5 made by Gentner called the RFC-1  for the Optomod 8100A.  I notice little difference between a stock Optomod and on RFC-1 Optomod.</p>
<p>That is a good starting point.  Most people are quite happy with this, but if needed, the high and low settings on the Prism can be adjusted slightly to suit the station equipment.  When properly adjusted, this equipment rides gain, adds a certain amount of loudness, while keeping the programming material natural sounding.  Further, unlike some &#8220;modern&#8221; air chain processors, it does not boot up and it does not occasionally loose its mind, requiring a reboot.</p>
<p>The best paragraph in the manual, or any broadcast equipment manual is this:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is a wealth of information available in the LED display.  A few minutes of watching them in <em>reduced light</em> (emphasis added) while listening to a familiar program input will greatly help in understanding their action.</p></blockquote>
<p>It will also greatly enhance your buzz, dude.  It was the 70&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/09/vintage-texar-audio-prisms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I like my smart phone the way it is, thank you.</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/i-like-my-smart-phone-the-way-it-is-thank-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/i-like-my-smart-phone-the-way-it-is-thank-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The NAB (National Association of Broadcasters), in trying to reach a settlement with the music industry, has decided that cellphones are part of the problem. No kidding, the fact that smart phones like the iPhone and Android do not have FM tuners seems to be a part of the negotiations, even though the cellphone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/htc-incredible.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1350" title="htc-incredible" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/htc-incredible-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>The NAB (National Association of Broadcasters), in trying to reach a settlement with the music industry, has decided that <a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1907040/music_industry_deal_with_broadcasters_could_affect_mobile_phones/" target="_blank">cellphones</a> are part of the problem.  No kidding, the fact that smart phones like the iPhone and Android do not have FM tuners seems to be a part of the negotiations, even though the cellphone industry has nothing to do with music royalties.  The argument is, more people will listen to, and more importantly, buy music if they have an FM tuner in their smartphone.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about that.</p>
<p>My HTC Android phone does have an FM tuner, it also has a metal detector.  I have found both the be novel applications.   Even though I work in radio, I have used the FM tuner twice.  Technically speaking, I find it to be adequate.  In order to receive anything, a pair of headphones or earbuds has to be used, because the headphone wire acts as the antenna.</p>
<p>That being said, I cannot count the number of times I have used Pandora or other online audio applications.  Several times a day at least.  Why?  Because the content it better.</p>
<p>If consumers want FM tuners in their cellphones, they will ask for them.  Cellphone manufacture&#8217;s will gladly comply, and make them.  The real problem is, most people don&#8217;t care about radio because most radio programming is boring and uninspired these days.  Let me paraphrase that:</p>
<p><strong>HELLO, BROADCASTERS!  ARE YOU LISTENING?  YOUR PROGRAMMING SUCKS! </strong></p>
<p>Offer a better product and listeners will return.  If there were a compelling reason to build FM tuners into cellphones, it would already be done.  Forcing the cellphone manufactures to do something they don&#8217;t want to do will simply drive up prices.</p>
<p>The NAB has led the radio industry astray for years now, we really should stop listening to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/i-like-my-smart-phone-the-way-it-is-thank-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of the Album Side</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/the-death-of-the-album-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/the-death-of-the-album-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music biz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I was a wee young lad, the local FM station in town did something called an &#8220;Album Side&#8221; every Wednesday night at 8 pm.  It was a great way to hear half of an album before plunking down five hard earned dollars at the record store.  It was also a way to sometimes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a wee young lad, the local FM station in town did something called an &#8220;Album Side&#8221; every Wednesday night at 8 pm.  It was a great way to hear half of an album before plunking down five hard earned dollars at the record store.  It was also a way to sometimes get a recording of half of the songs on the album using the trusty stereo cassette deck.</p>
<div id="attachment_1332" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 660px"><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Technics-SL-1200MK2-2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1332" title="Technics SL-1200MK2-2" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Technics-SL-1200MK2-2.jpg" alt="Technics SL-1200 turntable" width="650" height="392" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Technics SL-1200 Turntabe</p></div>
<p>By way of these unauthorized recordings, I accumulated a bunch of cassette tapes that had bands like Aerosmith on one side and Foreigner on the other.  Often, the last 8-10 minutes of a cassette tape side would be silent.  This, coupled with the auto reverse mechanism on the cassette deck often lead to confusion with my high school sweet heart&#8230; the music ends, then while we were otherwise distracted and several minutes later, the music begins again at high volume.</p>
<p>I grew up in much simpler times than these.</p>
<p>In any case, the advent of the CD pretty much ruined the concept of album sides.  It means much less to somebody to have a show where one would play &#8220;half the songs on a CD, one after another, without commercials or liners.&#8221;  When CD&#8217;s became the norm for music playback somewhere in the late 1980&#8242;s early 1990&#8242;s so went the album side.  These days, with computers, MP3&#8242;s and all the other music storage mediums, most people wouldn&#8217;t even know what an album side was.  The shame of it is, it was a great selling tool for the record industry.  Even though I owned those bootleg cassette tapes, later on, I went out and bought almost all of the albums that I had illegally recorded off of the radio.  To get the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/the-death-of-the-album-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remotes using a Smart Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/remotes-using-a-smart-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/remotes-using-a-smart-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was fooling around with my HTC  Android phone yesterday and discovered something that has a definite use for radio remotes.  An Application called Hertz will record .wav files, which can then be transfered via e-mail or ftp to the studio and played back on the air.  The program is pretty slick, it allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hertzandriod.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1280" title="hertzandriod" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hertzandriod.png" alt="" width="64" height="64" /></a>I was fooling around with my HTC  Android phone yesterday and discovered something that has a definite use for radio remotes.  An Application called <a href="http://uk.androlib.com/android.application.uk-ac-cam-cl-dtg-android-audionetworking-hertz-qzmC.aspx" target="_blank">Hertz</a> will record .wav files, which can then be transfered via e-mail or ftp to the studio and played back on the air.  The program is pretty slick, it allows sample rates from 8 to 44.1 khz.</p>
<p>I made a sample recording, the microphone in the HTC phone is okay, a better microphone would sound better.  After it was done, I emailed it to myself and listened on the laptop.  The email took about 4 minutes for a 20 seconds of a 32 kHz .wav file.  One could cut that down by choosing a lower sample rate.  I have found that 32 kHz it the minimal acceptable sample rate for analog FM.  Anything lower than that sounds choppy.</p>
<p>In another potential use, a news reporter could use this to record audio to save and transfer to a computer using a USB cable.  The recording time limit depends on the size of the SIM card and the sample rate.  Additionally, my HTC Android phone will detect and use WiFi networks, where available, for data services.  Using a WiFi network will avoid those 3G data charges and also increase download/upload speeds.</p>
<p>My Verizon plan has unlimited data transfer, so it really doesn&#8217;t matter what sample rate I use, your mileage may vary.</p>
<p>Couple the Hertz app with the VNC app mentioned previously, and a person could do all sorts of things remotely with a radio station.  The Hertz app is available for free download from the Android app store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/remotes-using-a-smart-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh. My. God. Becky, look at her butt&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/oh-my-god-becky-look-at-her-butt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/oh-my-god-becky-look-at-her-butt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music biz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is The Stairway to Heaven for a different decade.</p> <p>It is so big. She looks like, one of those rap guys&#8217; girlfriends. But, you know, who understands those rap guys? They only talk to her, because, she looks like a total prostitute, &#8216;kay?</p> <p>Ordinarily, I don&#8217;t much go in for such things as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is <em>The Stairway to Heaven </em>for a different decade.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is so big. She looks like, one of those rap guys&#8217; girlfriends. But, you know, who understands those rap guys?<br />
They only talk to her, because, she looks like a total prostitute, &#8216;kay?</p></blockquote>
<p>Ordinarily, I don&#8217;t much go in for such things as rap music.  But this is entertaining, and somewhat universal.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ImZTwYwCug&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ImZTwYwCug&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Hard to believe that it was almost twenty years ago.  Almost every lyric in that song is innuendo for some sex act.  Like it.  Dislike it.  No rules were broken when making this song.  It went to number 1 on the billboard chart in the summer of 1992 and no radio station anywhere ever received a fine for playing it.  It was quite scandalous at the time, of course, we were young and naive then.   Things have changed.</p>
<blockquote><p>To the beanpole dames in the magazines: You ain&#8217;t it, Miss Thing!</p></blockquote>
<p>I occurs to me that part of the reason that the radio industry sucks is because the music industry sucks.  The radio and music industry used to have a symbiotic relationship, each benefiting greatly from the existence of the other.  Of course, the greed and poor business practices of the last decade have driven every fun and thus entertaining element away from both industries.   Leave it to the bean counters, who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.</p>
<p>Sadly, no hit that I have heard on the top 40 station these days even comes close to the entertainment value of this 18 year old song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/08/oh-my-god-becky-look-at-her-butt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fireworks sychronized to music played over the radio!</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/07/fireworks-sychronized-to-music-played-over-the-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/07/fireworks-sychronized-to-music-played-over-the-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/?p=3928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In previous years, I have had the very pleasurable experience of setting up a fire works show remote with music synchronized to our FM radio station.  Ordinarily I don&#8217;t go near a remote broadcast, however, this is one of the more intricate broadcasts requiring coordination between the studio, the remote site and the fire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In previous years, I have had the very pleasurable experience of setting up a fire works show remote with music synchronized to our FM radio station.  Ordinarily I don&#8217;t go near a remote broadcast, however, this is one of the more intricate broadcasts requiring coordination between the studio, the remote site and the fire works barge anchored 300 yards off shore, out in the Hudson River.  The fireworks company, <a href="http://www.gardenstatefireworks.com/" target="_blank">Garden State Fireworks</a>, are consummate professionals and produce a very well choreographed show.</p>
<p>Giving them the synchronizing track on site is not very hard, however, I was surprised to hear that not every radio station does that.  In fact, one of our, ah, ehm, Clear Channel competitors from The big Metropolitan Center Nearby could not be bothered to do it for the 4th of July fireworks this summer and last summer too.</p>
<p>The synchronizing track is on the left channel of a CD that Garden State Fireworks created, it is 1200 baud FSK data, 8,N,1, so it is pretty robust.</p>
<p>I thought I would post on how I do it and why. First of all, for the how part, there are two options:</p>
<ol>
<li>Play the music CD at the remote site and relay broadcast quality music back to the studio without any time delay.  Hard to do even with an ISDN line.</li>
<li>Play the music CD at the studio and relay telephone quality audio for the firing track to the remote site from the studio.  Have the remote site play the air signal over the local PA system.</li>
</ol>
<p>Option number 2 is technically far easier than option number 1, although it takes a fair bit of coordination.  Also, the sound reinforcement guy didn&#8217;t like the air signal idea because the quality of the audio.   That is a little nit picky, especially given the fact that much of the music at the fireworks show will be drowned out by the fireworks explosions.    In the end, he saw it my way.</p>
<p>Here is a list of equipment needed:</p>
<ol>
<li>Telco auto answer coupler, such as the Indy Audio</li>
<li>Telco Hybrid, such as the Telos</li>
<li>If the announcer is at the fireworks site, a POTS CODEC such as a Comrex Matrix or blue box</li>
<li>Wireless microphone</li>
<li>Telephone set and cord with RJ-11 connector</li>
<li>Miscellaneous mic cables, power cords, etc</li>
<li>At the remote site, two pots lines from the local phone company, long distance  service as required.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here is the block diagram:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1185" title="Fire Works Block Diagram" src="http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Fire-Works-Block-Diagram.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Note, this assumes no delay in the telco network, which under ordinary circumstances using wired, not cellular network, there should not be any.  The touchiest part of the whole thing is getting the stage coordinated with the studio during the transition to the remote broadcast.  Once that is done, everything else just falls into place.</p>
<p>The firing computer is located on shore next to our broadcast booth.  They send the signal out to the barge on a wireless LAN link.</p>
<p>That is the how part.  Here is the why (soundtrack is a little low):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a17Tpjfp81M&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a17Tpjfp81M&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>That is from three years ago, but you get idea.</p>
<p>Even though I don&#8217;t work for these people anymore, I asked if they needed help with the broadcast this year.  &#8221;Nope, we got it, thanks.&#8221;  I will be paying close attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2010/07/fireworks-sychronized-to-music-played-over-the-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

